Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 25, 2026

Quantification of Mouse Heart Left Ventricular Function, Myocardial Strain, and Hemodynamic Forces by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Published on: May 24, 2021
Left ventricular diastolic function assessed with cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging and exercise capacity in
Lukasz A Małek1, Lidia Chojnowska, Mariusz Kłopotowski
1Klinika Choroby Wieńcowej, Instytut Kardiologii, ul. Alpejska 42, 04-628 Warszawa, Poland. lmalek@ikard.pl
Insights
Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) assessment of left ventricular (LV) diastolic function, specifically peak filling rate normalized to LV stroke volume index (PFR/LVSVI), is a useful marker for exercise capacity in non-obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) patients.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Imaging
- Exercise Physiology
Background:
- Diastolic dysfunction significantly limits exercise capacity in non-obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) with preserved left ventricular (LV) systolic function.
- Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is a valuable tool for HCM diagnosis, risk stratification, and monitoring.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the correlation between simple CMR-derived LV diastolic function parameters at rest and exercise capacity in non-obstructive HCM patients.
- To determine if resting CMR parameters can predict exercise limitations in this patient group.
Main Methods:
- 13 patients with non-obstructive HCM and preserved LV systolic function underwent treadmill cardiopulmonary exercise testing and CMR within one month.
- Key diastolic parameters analyzed included LV mass index (LVMI), PFR/LVSVI, and time from end-systole to PFR normalized to heart rhythm (TPFR).
Main Results:
- A significant positive correlation was found between resting PFR/LVSVI and peak oxygen uptake (V02peak) (r=0.64, p=0.02).
- Patients with lower V02peak (<30 ml/kg/min) exhibited significantly reduced PFR/LVSVI compared to those with higher V02peak (p=0.035).
- LVMI and TPFR did not correlate with exercise capacity; no significant correlations were observed between V02peak and age, LV ejection fraction, or normalized LV volumes.
Conclusions:
- Resting CMR assessment of LV diastolic function, particularly PFR/LVSVI, serves as a practical and effective marker for gauging exercise capacity in patients with non-obstructive HCM and preserved LV systolic function.
- This non-invasive imaging technique can aid in understanding exercise limitations in this specific HCM population.
Background:
In patients with non-obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) and preserved left ventricular (LV) systolic function, diastolic dysfunction is one of the major factors contributing to limited exercise capacity. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging has become a useful tool in diagnosis, risk stratification and treatment monitoring in patients with HCM.
Aim:
To assess the relationship between simple CMR parameters of LV diastolic function at rest and exercise capacity measured by means of cardiopulmonary exercise testing on a treadmill in patients with non-obstructive HCM and preserved LV systolic function.
Methods:
The study included 13 patients with non-obstructive HCM and preserved LV systolic function who underwent cardiopulmonary exercise testing on a treadmill and CMR within 1 month. Analysed parameters of diastolic function included: LV mass index (LVMI), peak filling rate normalised to LV stroke volume index (PFR/LVSVI) and time from the end-systole to PFR normalised to heart rhythm (TPFR).
Results:
There was a significant correlation between PFR/LVSVI at rest and peak oxygen uptake (V02peak) (r=0.64, p=0.02). Patients with V02peak below median (<30 ml/kg/min) had a significantly lower PFR/LVSVI than patients with higher V02peak [5.12 m2/s, interquartile range (IQR) 4.16-6.82 vs. 7.93 m2/s, IQR 7.49-8.21 respectively, p=0.035]. LVMI, TPFR were not related to exercise capacity. There was also no correlation between V02peak and age (r=-0.38, p=0.19), LV ejection fraction (r=-0.36, p=0.22) or normalised LV volume indices: LVEDVI (r=0.09, p=0.76), LVESVI (r=0.34, p=0.26).
Conclusions:
Assessment of LV diastolic function by peak filling rate normalised to stroke volume index by means of CMR at rest in patients with non-obstructive HCM and preserved LV systolic function is a useful marker of exercise capacity.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy IV: Restrictive Cardiomyopathy
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests

