Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Statistical Methods to Analyze Parametric Data: ANOVA01:12

Statistical Methods to Analyze Parametric Data: ANOVA

Analysis of Variance, or ANOVA, is a powerful statistical technique used to analyze parametric data, primarily in research and experimental studies. It's designed to compare the means of two or more groups, assisting researchers in identifying any significant differences between these group means. There are two main types of ANOVA based on the complexity of the analysis: one-way and two-way.
One-way ANOVA is applied when a single independent variable or factor is scrutinized. It compares the...
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and Cox...
Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks01:21

Friedman Two-way Analysis of Variance by Ranks

Friedman's Two-Way Analysis of Variance by Ranks is a nonparametric test designed to identify differences across multiple test attempts when traditional assumptions of normality and equal variances do not apply. Unlike conventional ANOVA, which requires normally distributed data with equal variances, Friedman's test is ideal for ordinal or non-normally distributed data, making it particularly useful for analyzing dependent samples, such as matched subjects over time or repeated measures from...
One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes01:15

One-Way ANOVA: Equal Sample Sizes

One-Way ANOVA can be performed on three or more samples with equal or unequal sample sizes. When one-way ANOVA is performed on two datasets with samples of equal sizes, it can be easily observed that the computed F statistic is highly sensitive to the sample mean.
Different sample means can result in different values for the variance estimate: variance between samples. This is because the variance between samples is calculated as the product of the sample size and the variance between the...
One-Way ANOVA01:18

One-Way ANOVA

One-way ANOVA analyzes more than three samples categorized by one factor. For example, it can compare the average mileage of sports bikes. Here, the data is categorized by one factor - the company. However, one-way ANOVA cannot be used to simultaneously compare the sample mean of three or more samples categorized by two factors. An example of two factors would be sports bikes from different companies driven in different terrains, such as a desert or snowy landscape. Here, two-way ANOVA is used...
Two-Way ANOVA01:17

Two-Way ANOVA

The two-way ANOVA is an extension of the one-way ANOVA. It is a statistical test performed on three or more samples categorized by two factors - a row factor and a column factor. Ronald Fischer mentioned it in 1925 in his book 'Statistical Methods for Researchers.'
The two-way ANOVA analysis initially begins by stating the null hypothesis that there is an interaction effect between the two factors of a dataset. This effect can be visualized using line segments formed by joining the means for...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Efficient Selection of Gaussian Kernel SVM Parameters for Imbalanced Data.

Genes·2023
Same author

Echocardiography and Management for Cardiac Trauma.

Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia·2022
Same author

Prognostic and predictive signatures for treatment decisions.

Biomarkers in medicine·2018
Same author

Difficult Retrieval of a Broken Catheter From a Total Implantable Venous Access Device.

The Journal of invasive cardiology·2018
Same author

Is premarket identification of hepatotoxic drugs and sensitive patients possible based on high-dimensional 'omic data?

Personalized medicine·2018
Same author

Development of predictive signatures for treatment selection in precision medicine with survival outcomes.

Pharmaceutical statistics·2018
Same journal

Cross-Domain Transfer Learning from Peptides to Metabolites Using a Multi-Property Fine-Tuned LLM.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

Biomedical Concept Recognition with Error-aware Negative-enhanced Ranking Framework.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

TEDLH: Domain HMMs for sensitive detection of remote homologues.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

PLNFGL: Joint Estimation of Multi-Condition Gene Networks from Single-cell RNA-seq Data.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

MCFST: Spatial domain identification method based on multi-view graph convolutional network and graph fusion network.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
Same journal

SpaBiT: Enhancing Spatial Transcriptomics Resolution via Bidirectional Attention Transformers.

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 25, 2026

A Protocol for Using Gene Set Enrichment Analysis to Identify the Appropriate Animal Model for Translational Research
09:35

A Protocol for Using Gene Set Enrichment Analysis to Identify the Appropriate Animal Model for Translational Research

Published on: August 16, 2017

Multivariate analysis of variance test for gene set analysis.

Chen-An Tsai1, James J Chen

  • 1Graduate Institute of Biostatistics and Biostatistics Center, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan. catsai@mail.cmu.edu.tw

Bioinformatics (Oxford, England)
|March 4, 2009
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Gene class testing (GCT) identifies differential gene expression across conditions. A new multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) approach improves gene set analysis (GSA) performance, especially with limited samples.

More Related Videos

Analyzing Multifactorial RNA-Seq Experiments with DiCoExpress
05:22

Analyzing Multifactorial RNA-Seq Experiments with DiCoExpress

Published on: July 29, 2022

Comprehensive Workflow for the Genome-wide Identification and Expression Meta-analysis of the ATL E3 Ubiquitin Ligase Gene Family in Grapevine
10:40

Comprehensive Workflow for the Genome-wide Identification and Expression Meta-analysis of the ATL E3 Ubiquitin Ligase Gene Family in Grapevine

Published on: December 22, 2017

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 25, 2026

A Protocol for Using Gene Set Enrichment Analysis to Identify the Appropriate Animal Model for Translational Research
09:35

A Protocol for Using Gene Set Enrichment Analysis to Identify the Appropriate Animal Model for Translational Research

Published on: August 16, 2017

Analyzing Multifactorial RNA-Seq Experiments with DiCoExpress
05:22

Analyzing Multifactorial RNA-Seq Experiments with DiCoExpress

Published on: July 29, 2022

Comprehensive Workflow for the Genome-wide Identification and Expression Meta-analysis of the ATL E3 Ubiquitin Ligase Gene Family in Grapevine
10:40

Comprehensive Workflow for the Genome-wide Identification and Expression Meta-analysis of the ATL E3 Ubiquitin Ligase Gene Family in Grapevine

Published on: December 22, 2017

Area of Science:

  • Bioinformatics
  • Statistical Genetics
  • Computational Biology

Background:

  • Gene class testing (GCT) or gene set analysis (GSA) assesses differential expression in predefined gene sets across experimental conditions.
  • Existing GSA methods often handle only two conditions or rely on univariate statistics, with limitations in handling complex datasets.
  • The Fisher's exact test has known shortcomings for overrepresentation analysis in GSA.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) approach for gene set analysis (GSA) applicable to two or more experimental conditions.
  • To address limitations of existing GSA methods, particularly when the number of genes exceeds the number of samples.
  • To evaluate the performance of the proposed MANOVA test against other established GSA methods.

Main Methods:

  • A multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) approach is developed for GSA.
  • A shrinkage covariance matrix estimator is employed to handle singular and ill-conditioned sample covariance matrices.
  • The proposed MANOVA test is compared with six other GSA methods (PCA, SAM-GS, ANCOVA, Global, GSEA, MaxMean) using simulations and real microarray data.

Main Results:

  • The proposed MANOVA test demonstrates superior performance in controlling type I error and maintaining statistical power in simulations.
  • When gene set size exceeds sample size, the MANOVA test with shrinkage estimation mitigates biases common in standard multivariate methods.
  • MANOVA generally shows comparable power to GSEA and MaxMean in identifying significant gene sets across various experimental conditions.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed MANOVA approach offers a robust and effective method for gene set analysis, particularly in complex experimental designs.
  • The MANOVA test provides improved control over statistical errors and enhanced power for detecting differential gene expression in gene sets.
  • The R-code for the MANOVA test is publicly available, facilitating its application in biological research.