Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 25, 2026

Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages
06:04

Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages

Published on: March 24, 2023

A framework for good practice: managing failures in a cochlear implant service.

Julie Brinton1

  • 1South of England Cochlear Implant Centre, Institute of Sound and Vibration Research, Southampton University, Southampton, UK.

Cochlear Implants International
|March 4, 2009
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

United Kingdom national paediatric bilateral cochlear implant audit: preliminary results.

Cochlear implants international·2014
Same author

Conversion of scores between Bamford, Kowal and Bench (BKB) sentences and Arthur Boothroyd (AB) words in quiet for cochlear implant patients.

Cochlear implants international·2009
Same author

Bilateral sequential cochlear implantation in the congenitally deaf child: evidence to support the concept of a 'critical age' after which the second ear is less likely to provide an adequate level of speech perception on its own.

Cochlear implants international·2009
Same author

Symbolic play as a predictor of language development following cochlear implantation: preliminary results.

Cochlear implants international·2008
Same author

Editorial. Bilateral cochlear implantation : the British Cochlear Implant Group position.

Cochlear implants international·2008
Same author

Phonological awareness, vocabulary, and word reading in children who use cochlear implants: does age of implantation explain individual variability in performance outcomes and growth?

Journal of deaf studies and deaf education·2007

Cochlear implant failure is distressing, but a new protocol ensures quality care during device failure, re-implantation, and rehabilitation. This aims to improve patient outcomes and streamline the process for families.

Area of Science:

  • Audiology
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Neurosurgery

Background:

  • Cochlear implants significantly improve sound and speech access for recipients.
  • Device failure in cochlear implant users can cause significant distress for patients and families.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop a standardized protocol for managing cochlear implant device failure.
  • To ensure consistent quality of clinical care throughout the failure, re-implantation, and rehabilitation process.

Main Methods:

  • A working party comprising cochlear implant center coordinators and Ear Foundation representatives was convened.
  • The group met to collaboratively develop a protocol for device failure management.
  • The protocol was designed for widespread adoption within the British Cochlear Implant Group.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 25, 2026

Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages
06:04

Systematic Hearing Performance Evaluation Process for Adolescents with Cochlear Implantation at Early Ages

Published on: March 24, 2023

Main Results:

  • A comprehensive protocol for managing cochlear implant device failure has been established.
  • The protocol outlines quality standards for clinical care in cases of device failure.
  • This initiative aims to standardize and improve the management of cochlear implant failures.

Conclusions:

  • The developed protocol provides a framework for consistent and high-quality care during cochlear implant device failure.
  • Standardized management protocols can mitigate distress and improve outcomes for cochlear implant recipients experiencing device failure.
  • Collaboration between clinical centers and patient support organizations is crucial for developing effective patient care guidelines.