Related Experiment Videos
Different fits satisfy different needs: linking person-environment fit to employee commitment and performance using
Gary J Greguras1, James M Diefendorff
1Lee Kong Chian School of Business, Singapore Management University, Singapore. garygreguras@smu.edu.sg
The Journal of Applied Psychology
|March 11, 2009
Summary
Employee psychological need satisfaction, driven by person-environment fit, boosts commitment and job performance. This study explores how autonomy, relatedness, and competence needs link fit to outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Organizational Psychology
- Industrial-Organizational Psychology
- Human Resources Management
Background:
- Theories of person-environment fit (PE fit) and self-determination theory are foundational in understanding employee attitudes and behaviors.
- Existing research highlights the importance of alignment between individuals and their work environment but often lacks a detailed explication of mediating mechanisms.
- Understanding the psychological processes linking PE fit to tangible outcomes like commitment and performance is crucial for organizational effectiveness.
Purpose of the Study:
- To test a model where psychological need satisfaction (autonomy, relatedness, competence) mediates the relationship between various types of PE fit and employee outcomes.
- To examine the specific links between person-organization fit, person-group fit, and job demands-abilities fit with psychological need satisfaction.
- To investigate the direct and indirect effects of PE fit on affective organizational commitment and job performance.
Main Methods:
- A quantitative study involving 163 full-time employees and their supervisors, with data collected across three distinct time periods.
- Utilized survey methodology to measure perceived person-organization fit, person-group fit, job demands-abilities fit, psychological need satisfaction, affective commitment, and job performance.
- Employed mediation and regression analyses to test the proposed theoretical model.
Main Results:
- Different facets of PE fit were found to predict distinct types of psychological need satisfaction.
- Satisfaction of psychological needs for autonomy, relatedness, and competence significantly predicted both affective organizational commitment and job performance.
- Person-organization fit and demands-abilities fit demonstrated direct positive effects on affective organizational commitment, beyond their indirect effects through need satisfaction.
Conclusions:
- Psychological need satisfaction acts as a partial mediator, explaining how various forms of PE fit influence employee commitment and performance.
- The findings support an integrated model, underscoring the critical role of fulfilling employees' basic psychological needs in the workplace.
- Organizations should focus on fostering PE fit to enhance need satisfaction, thereby improving employee attitudes and behavioral outcomes.
Related Concept Videos
Ryan and Deci's Self-Determination Theory
Self-Determination Theory (SDT), formulated by Richard Ryan and Edward Deci, explains that human motivation is driven by three fundamental psychological needs: autonomy, competence, and relatedness. When these needs are met, individuals experience personal growth, intrinsic motivation, and overall well-being.
Autonomy is the need to feel in control of one's actions and decisions. For example, a student who chooses their research topic is likely to be more engaged and motivated than one who is...
Autonomy is the need to feel in control of one's actions and decisions. For example, a student who chooses their research topic is likely to be more engaged and motivated than one who is...
Self-Discrepancy Theory
One influential perspective on what motivates people's behavior is detailed in Tory Higgin's self-discrepancy theory (Higgins, 1987). He proposed that people hold disagreeing internal representations of themselves that lead to different emotional states.
Importance of Need for Affiliation
The need for affiliation is a fundamental human motive that drives individuals to form and maintain interpersonal relationships. This universal drive varies in intensity among individuals due to genetic predispositions and life experiences, shaping it into a relatively stable personality trait. Social inclusion enhances emotional well-being by fulfilling the need for affiliation, whereas social exclusion leads to distress, negative emotions, and cognitive impairments.Psychological and Emotional...
Carl Rogers' Humanistic Perspective on Personality
Carl Rogers, a key figure in humanistic psychology, believed that individuals possess an innate potential for growth and fulfillment. According to his model of personality, three significant components define an individual: the organism, the self, and conditions of worth.
The organism refers to an individual's inherent blueprint, which Rogers saw as innately positive and directed toward helping others, unlike Freud's view of the id as driven by base impulses. The self is a person's...
The organism refers to an individual's inherent blueprint, which Rogers saw as innately positive and directed toward helping others, unlike Freud's view of the id as driven by base impulses. The self is a person's...
Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification
Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...
Attribution Theory
Behavior is a product of both the situation (e.g., cultural influences, social roles, and the presence of bystanders) and of the person (e.g., personality characteristics). Subfields of psychology tend to focus on one influence or behavior over others. Situationism is the view that our behavior and actions are determined by our immediate environment and surroundings. In contrast, dispositionism holds that our behavior is determined by internal factors (Heider, 1958). An internal factor is an...