Jove
Visualize
Contact Us

Related Concept Videos

Social Loafing01:37

Social Loafing

Another way in which a group presence can affect performance is social loafing—the exertion of less effort by a person working together with a group. Social loafing occurs when our individual performance cannot be evaluated separately from the group. Thus, group performance declines on easy tasks (Karau & Williams, 1993). Essentially individual group members loaf and let other group members pick up the slack. Because each individual’s efforts cannot be evaluated, individuals become less...
Social Proof00:52

Social Proof

Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
Halo Effect01:27

Halo Effect

The halo effect is a cognitive bias in which an individual's overall impression influences judgments about their specific traits. This psychological phenomenon leads people to associate positive characteristics with those they perceive as generally good and negative characteristics with those they view as bad. This effect is particularly influential in social perception, professional evaluations, and decision-making processes.The Psychological Basis of the Halo EffectThe halo effect is rooted...
Impact of Individuals on a Group01:25

Impact of Individuals on a Group

In social psychology, the interplay between individuals and groups is a central concern, particularly regarding how individual actions and characteristics influence group processes and outcomes. While much research emphasizes the group's power in shaping individual behavior, it is equally significant to understand how individuals contribute to the functioning, development, and success of groups.Individual Roles in Group Productivity and Decision-MakingIndividuals are not passive participants in...
Relationship Formation02:12

Relationship Formation

What do you think is the single most influential factor in determining with whom you become friends and whom you form romantic relationships? You might be surprised to learn that the answer is simple: the people with whom you have the most contact. This most important factor is proximity. You are more likely to be friends with people you have regular contact with. For example, there are decades of research that shows that you are more likely to become friends with people who live in your dorm,...
Social Facilitation01:04

Social Facilitation

Not all intergroup interactions lead to negative outcomes. Sometimes, being in a group situation can improve performance. Social facilitation occurs when an individual performs better when an audience is watching than when the individual performs the behavior alone. This typically occurs when people are performing a task for which they are skilled.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Diversity, networks, and innovation: A text analytic approach to measuring expertise diversity.

Network science (Cambridge University Press)·2026
Same author

Organizing for Mars: A Task Management Perspective on Work within Spaceflight Multiteam Systems.

Human factors·2022
Same author

How Team Interlock Ecosystems Shape the Assembly of Scientific Teams: A Hypergraph Approach.

Communication methods and measures·2019
Same author

Social network approaches to leadership: an integrative conceptual review.

The Journal of applied psychology·2015
Same author

Integrating social networks and human social motives to achieve social influence at scale.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2014
Same author

Charting a course for collaboration: a multiteam perspective.

Translational behavioral medicine·2013
Same journal

Grateful leaders and attentive followers: How grateful attention transmits the cascade of gratitude expressions to strengthen coworker relationships.

The Journal of applied psychology·2026
Same journal

Scoring employment interviews with large language models: Evaluation design components, validity investigations, and best practice recommendations.

The Journal of applied psychology·2026
Same journal

A profile analysis of leader interpersonal emotion management strategies.

The Journal of applied psychology·2026
Same journal

A choice architecture intervention to increase diversity: Diverse defaults can counteract hiring discrimination.

The Journal of applied psychology·2026
Same journal

Transformational leadership in context: A meta-analysis of 40 years of research.

The Journal of applied psychology·2026
Same journal

Organizations espousing an authenticity ideology repel stigmatized job seekers.

The Journal of applied psychology·2026
See all related articles
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Information sharing and team performance: a meta-analysis.

Jessica R Mesmer-Magnus1, Leslie A Dechurch

  • 1Department of Management, Cameron School of Business, University of North Carolina Wilmington, Wilmington, NC 28403, USA. magnusj@uncw.edu

The Journal of Applied Psychology
|March 11, 2009
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Effective team information sharing significantly boosts team performance, cohesion, and decision satisfaction. This meta-analysis synthesizes 72 studies, confirming its importance across various contexts.

Related Experiment Videos

Area of Science:

  • Social Psychology
  • Organizational Behavior
  • Team Dynamics

Background:

  • Information sharing is crucial for teams to leverage collective knowledge.
  • Effective information exchange underpins team success and integration.
  • Previous research highlights the importance of information sharing but requires synthesis.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To synthesize existing research on team information sharing through meta-analysis.
  • To determine the impact of information sharing on team outcomes.
  • To identify moderators influencing the relationship between information sharing and team performance.

Main Methods:

  • Conducted a meta-analysis of 72 independent studies.
  • Included data from 4,795 groups and 17,279 individuals.
  • Analyzed the relationship between information sharing and team performance, cohesion, decision satisfaction, and knowledge integration.

Main Results:

  • Information sharing positively predicts team performance, cohesion, decision satisfaction, and knowledge integration.
  • The positive relationship between information sharing and team performance holds across various moderator levels.
  • Moderators include the representation of information sharing (uniqueness vs. openness), performance criteria, task type, and a three-way interaction with discussion structure.

Conclusions:

  • Information sharing is a vital determinant of team effectiveness.
  • Factors like task demonstrability, discussion structure, and cooperation enhance information sharing.
  • Information distribution, informational interdependence, and member heterogeneity can detract from information sharing.