Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Impact of Schemas

Impact of Schemas

Schemas are cognitive structures that provide a framework for interpreting and organizing social information. They help individuals navigate complex environments by offering expectations about people, events, and behaviors. Schemas influence attention, encoding, and retrieval processes, thereby shaping the entire trajectory of information processing in social contexts.Attention and Cognitive LoadDuring initial attention, schemas function as filters that prioritize schema-consistent information,...

Stereotype Threat and Self-fulfilling Prophecies

Stereotype Threat and Self-fulfilling Prophecies

When we hold a stereotype about a person, we have expectations that he or she will fulfill that stereotype. A self-fulfilling prophecy is an expectation held by a person that alters his or her behavior in a way that tends to make it true. When we hold stereotypes about a person, we tend to treat the person according to our expectations. This treatment can influence the person to act according to our stereotypic expectations, thus confirming our stereotypic beliefs. Research by Rosenthal and...

Halo Effect

Halo Effect

The halo effect is a cognitive bias in which an individual's overall impression influences judgments about their specific traits. This psychological phenomenon leads people to associate positive characteristics with those they perceive as generally good and negative characteristics with those they view as bad. This effect is particularly influential in social perception, professional evaluations, and decision-making processes.The Psychological Basis of the Halo EffectThe halo effect is rooted...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

From exemplars to categories: generalization of action-effect learning in a free-choice task.

Psychological research·2026

Same author

Introspection without execution: Evidence for introspective switch costs in NoGo trials.

Consciousness and cognition·2026

Same author

The asymmetric list shift effect - flexible adaptation to new context demands?

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026

Same author

Task switching promotes switch readiness: Evidence from forced and voluntary task switching.

Cognition·2026

Same author

The (in)flexibility of updating a mental task representation: On the origins of costs when shifting from a task-switching to a single-task context.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2025

Same author

How Implicit Sequence Learning and Explicit Sequence Knowledge Are Expressed in a Serial Response Time Task.

Journal of cognition·2025

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 25, 2026

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking

Published on: August 29, 2018

How task representations guide attention: further evidence for the shielding function of task sets.

Gesine Dreisbach¹, Hilde Haider

¹Department of Psychology, University of Bielefeld, Bielefeld, Germany. gesine.dreisbach@uni-bielefeld.de

Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition

|March 11, 2009

Summary

Cognitive control requires shielding goal-directed behavior from irrelevant information. Using a general task set (TS) prevents processing unrelated distractors, unlike memorizing stimulus-response (S-R) mappings.

More Related Videos

A Dual Task Procedure Combined with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Test Attentional Blink for Nontargets

A Dual Task Procedure Combined with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Test Attentional Blink for Nontargets

Published on: December 5, 2014

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 25, 2026

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking

Published on: August 29, 2018

A Dual Task Procedure Combined with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Test Attentional Blink for Nontargets

A Dual Task Procedure Combined with Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Test Attentional Blink for Nontargets

Published on: December 5, 2014

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

Area of Science:

Cognitive Psychology
Neuroscience

Background:

Goal-directed behavior necessitates shielding cognitive processes from irrelevant information.
Cognitive control literature primarily focuses on online adjustments, overlooking preventive mechanisms.
Preventive goal shielding proposes circumventing irrelevant information before processing.

Purpose of the Study:

To investigate a preventive goal shielding mechanism.
To compare the effects of stimulus-response (S-R) mappings versus a general task set (TS) on distractor interference.
To determine how task representations influence attention and information processing.

Main Methods:

Participants performed a reaction time task involving target words (clothing items) and visual distractors (semantically related or unrelated).
Two groups were employed: one memorizing S-R mappings, the other using a general TS.
Distractor interference was measured by comparing performance in the presence of related and unrelated distractors.

Main Results:

In the S-R group, both semantically related and unrelated distractors interfered with performance.
In the TS group, only semantically related distractors caused interference; unrelated distractors had no significant effect.
This suggests that a general TS effectively prevents the processing of unrelated irrelevant information.

Conclusions:

Task representations, specifically general task sets, play a crucial role in preventive goal shielding.
General task sets enhance attentional focus on relevant information, thereby blocking irrelevant information processing.
This mechanism complements online cognitive control strategies for maintaining goal-directed behavior.