Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...

Bias

Bias

Bias refers to any tendency that prevents a question from being considered unprejudiced. In research, bias occurs when one outcome or answer is selected or encouraged over others in sampling or testing. Bias can occur during any research phase, including study design, data collection, analysis, and publication.
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:

Blind Procedures

Blind Procedures

Ideally, the people who observe and record the children’s behavior are unaware of who was assigned to the experimental or control group, in order to control for experimenter bias. Experimenter bias refers to the possibility that a researcher’s expectations might skew the results of the study. Remember, conducting an experiment requires a lot of planning, and the people involved in the research project have a vested interest in supporting their hypotheses. If the observers knew which child was...

Controls in Experiments

Controls in Experiments

When conducting an experiment, it is crucial to have control to reduce bias and accurately measure the dependent variables. It also marks the results more reliable. Controls are elements in an experiment that have the same characteristics as the treatment groups but are not affected by the independent variable. By sorting these data into control and experimental conditions, the relationship between the dependent and independent variables can be drawn. A randomized experiment always includes a...

Case Studies

Case Studies

There are many research methods available to psychologists in their efforts to understand, describe, and explain behavior and the cognitive and biological processes that underlie it.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Findings from comprehensive genome sequencing in the Canadian population: Results from the GENCOV Study.

Genetics in medicine open·2026

Same author

Prevalence of and risk factors for antimicrobial resistance in pneumococcal disease in southern Ontario during the PCV13 era.

Vaccine·2026

Same author

Clinically significant DNA variation from the GENCOV and HostSeq COVID-19 genome sequencing studies.

Journal of medical genetics·2026

Same author

Integrated Estimates of Forest Expansion Opportunity in New York State.

Environmental management·2026

Same author

Real-world Study of Three-gas Breath Testing Nationwide and the Association With Symptoms.

Journal of clinical gastroenterology·2026

Same author

Invasive Group A Streptococcal Disease in Persons Experiencing Postpandemic Homelessness in Canada.

JAMA network open·2026

Same journal

Application of the E-value under non-proportional hazards.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026

Same journal

Can the All of Us sample be reweighted to mirror a nationally representative sample? A comparison of mortality predictors.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026

Same journal

Gut health, systemic inflammation, and linear growth among Indonesian infants: findings from the Action Against Stunting Hub observation cohort: Erratum.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026

Same journal

Evaluating Estimators in Partially Identified Models.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026

Same journal

Stratification and accumulation? Explaining changing mortality inequities between business owners and non-owners in the U.S. (1984-2022).

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026

Same journal

Be wary of age-stratum aging in early-onset cancer trends.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026

See all related articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Are nested case-control studies biased?

Bryan Langholz¹, David Richardson

¹Department of Preventive Medicine, Division of Biostatistics, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90089-9011, USA.

Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.)

|March 18, 2009

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Nested case-control studies are valid even with lagged exposures, contrary to recent claims. This research introduces a simulation method to empirically evaluate study design performance, using uranium miners as an example.

Related Experiment Videos

Area of Science:

Epidemiology
Biostatistics

Background:

A recent assertion claims nested case-control studies introduce bias with lagged exposures.
This claim is based on theoretical and empirical arguments.

Purpose of the Study:

To examine and refute the assertion of "study design bias" in nested case-control studies with lagged exposures.
To propose and demonstrate an appropriate empirical evaluation method for nested case-control designs.

Main Methods:

Critically analyzed the theoretical and empirical arguments presented in the assertion.
Developed an empirical evaluation approach using simulation of case-control outcomes from cohort risk sets.
Illustrated the proposed methods with data from the Colorado Plateau uranium miners cohort.

Main Results:

The theoretical and empirical arguments for "study design bias" in nested case-control studies with lagged exposures were found to be incorrect.
The proposed simulation-based empirical evaluation method provides a tailored assessment of study design performance.
The methods are practical and applicable to real-world cohort data.

Conclusions:

Nested case-control studies are not inherently biased by lagged exposures.
The proposed empirical evaluation method offers a robust approach to assess the validity of nested case-control designs.
This work validates the utility of nested case-control studies in epidemiological research.