Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 24, 2026

Study of In Vivo Glucose Metabolism in High-fat Diet-fed Mice Using Oral Glucose Tolerance Test (OGTT) and Insulin Tolerance Test (ITT)
Published on: January 7, 2018
Failure to metformin and insulin secretagogue monotherapy: an observational cohort study
Laura Pala1, Matteo Monami, Caterina Lamanna
1Section of Endocrinology, Department of Clinical Pathophysiology, University of Florence and Azienda Ospedaliera Careggi, Florence, Italy. l.pala@dfc.unifi.it
Abstract:
The aim of the present cohort study is the assessment of treatment failure rates in patients on monotherapy with metformin or insulin secretagogues, observed in a routine clinical setting. A cohort of patients without any pharmacological treatment was also observed. A retrospective observational cohort study was performed on a consecutive series of 2,020 type 2 diabetic patients receiving monotherapy with an oral agent (metformin or insulin secretagogue, n = 1,126) or drug-naive (n = 894). HbA1c and prescribed hypoglycemic therapy were recorded yearly. Patients were followed until death, change of residence, failure to treatment, or up to 48 months. The mean duration of follow up was 34.8 ± 18.0 months. In a Cox regression analysis, metformin was associated with a significant reduction, and insulin secretagogues with a significant increase, in the risk of failure to therapy during follow up. When duration of diabetes and baseline BMI were added to the model, insulin secretagogues, but not metformin, were still associated with increased risk of failure. In conclusion, insulin secretagogues are associated with increased failure rate in comparison with metformin. This difference could be due to detrimental effect of secretagogues, rather than to a beneficial action of metformin.
Insights
This study found that insulin secretagogues lead to higher treatment failure rates in type 2 diabetes patients compared to metformin. Metformin use was associated with a reduced risk of therapy failure.
Area of Science:
- Endocrinology
- Pharmacology
- Clinical Medicine
Background:
- Type 2 diabetes management often involves oral hypoglycemic agents.
- Metformin and insulin secretagogues are common first-line monotherapies.
- Understanding comparative treatment failure rates is crucial for optimizing patient outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To assess and compare treatment failure rates between metformin and insulin secretagogue monotherapy in type 2 diabetes.
- To evaluate the risk of therapy failure in drug-naive patients.
- To identify factors influencing treatment efficacy in a real-world clinical setting.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective observational cohort study of 2,020 type 2 diabetic patients.
- Patients received metformin, insulin secretagogues, or no pharmacological treatment.
- Follow-up included HbA1c, therapy changes, and adverse events for up to 48 months.
- Cox regression analysis was used to determine risk factors for treatment failure.
Main Results:
- Metformin monotherapy was linked to a significantly lower risk of treatment failure.
- Insulin secretagogue monotherapy was associated with a significantly higher risk of treatment failure.
- This increased risk with insulin secretagogues persisted even after adjusting for diabetes duration and BMI.
Conclusions:
- Insulin secretagogues demonstrate a higher failure rate compared to metformin in type 2 diabetes management.
- The findings suggest a potential detrimental effect of insulin secretagogues rather than solely a beneficial effect of metformin.
- These results have implications for selecting oral hypoglycemic agents to improve long-term treatment success.
Related Concept Videos
Oral Hypoglycemic Agents: Biguanides and Glitazones
Insulin: Dosing Regimen and Adverse Effects
The basal dose constitutes about 40%-50% of the total daily dose, with the rest as premeal insulin. The mealtime insulin dose should mirror...
Oral Hypoglycemic Agents: Glinides
Oral Hypoglycemic Agents: Sulfonylureas
Hypoglycemia
Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4 Inhibitors