Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision01:15

Depth Perception and Spatial Vision

Depth perception is the ability to perceive objects three-dimensionally. It relies on two types of cues: binocular and monocular. Binocular cues depend on the combination of images from both eyes and how the eyes work together. Since the eyes are in slightly different positions, each eye captures a slightly different image. This disparity between images, known as binocular disparity, helps the brain interpret depth. When the brain compares these images, it determines the distance to an object.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Seeing through space and time: Comparing the effects of exogenous spatial and rhythmic temporal attention on visual awareness.

Consciousness and cognition·2026
Same author

The heart knows you are wrong: Heart rate modulations associated with perceptual errors.

Biological psychology·2026
Same author

Does the output form of inhibition of return operate at or after the bottleneck?

Acta psychologica·2025
Same author

Assessing Posner's theory of alerting: A meta-analysis of speed-accuracy effects.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2025
Same author

Exploring the causal involvement of the rIPL and white matter interindividual variability in spatial orienting and consciousness.

NeuroImage·2025
Same author

Neural representation of consciously seen and unseen information.

Scientific reports·2025
Same journal

Low prevalence targets are primarily missed due to mind wandering.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
Same journal

An introduction to the special issue celebrating Mary A. Peterson.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
Same journal

Properties of the threshold stimulus exposure duration (TSED) measure of visual search efficiency.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
Same journal

Auditory selective attention in depth: Investigating directional dependency across front, lateral, and rear spaces.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
Same journal

Dissociations between stereoacuity and visual acuity with binocular night vision goggles.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
Same journal

Reward-based prioritization and perceptual feature effects on attentional flexibility in working memory.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 24, 2026

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

Spatial attention does improve temporal discrimination.

Ana B Chica1, John Christie

  • 1University of Granada, Granada, Spain. anachica@ugr.es

Attention, Perception & Psychophysics
|March 24, 2009
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Exogenous attention, or external cues, was previously thought to impair temporal resolution. However, controlling for speed-accuracy trade-offs reveals that attention actually improves performance on temporal resolution tasks.

More Related Videos

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity
06:46

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity

Published on: March 18, 2019

Measurement & Analysis of the Temporal Discrimination Threshold Applied to Cervical Dystonia
10:05

Measurement & Analysis of the Temporal Discrimination Threshold Applied to Cervical Dystonia

Published on: January 27, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 24, 2026

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity
06:46

Investigating the Deployment of Visual Attention Before Accurate and Averaging Saccades via Eye Tracking and Assessment of Visual Sensitivity

Published on: March 18, 2019

Measurement & Analysis of the Temporal Discrimination Threshold Applied to Cervical Dystonia
10:05

Measurement & Analysis of the Temporal Discrimination Threshold Applied to Cervical Dystonia

Published on: January 27, 2018

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Perception

Background:

  • Previous research suggests exogenous attention impairs temporal resolution.
  • Spatial cueing paradigms often show decreased temporal resolution with attention.
  • Speed-accuracy trade-offs (SATs) complicate interpretations in prior studies.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Investigate the true effect of spatial attention on temporal resolution.
  • Control for confounding speed-accuracy trade-offs in experimental design.
  • Clarify the role of exogenous attention in temporal processing.

Main Methods:

  • Experiments designed to control for SATs by constraining response times (RTs).
  • Participants performed temporal resolution tasks with spatial cues.
  • Comparison of performance across cued, uncued, and neutral trials within controlled time windows.

Main Results:

  • When RT was controlled, cued trials showed impaired performance versus neutral trials, replicating prior findings.
  • However, comparing cued versus uncued trials revealed improved performance for cued trials.
  • This reversal suggests SATs significantly influenced previous conclusions.

Conclusions:

  • Exogenous attention does not impair, but rather improves, performance on temporal resolution tasks.
  • Speed-accuracy trade-offs are a critical factor to consider in temporal resolution research.
  • Re-evaluation of prior findings is necessary given the role of SATs.