Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Ethical Dilemmas II01:30

Ethical Dilemmas II

Resolving an ethical dilemma in healthcare involves a systematic approach that considers every aspect of the issue, respecting both the patient's needs and values and the healthcare professional's ethical obligations. Here are potential steps to resolve an ethical dilemma:
Ethical Issues01:27

Ethical Issues

Nurses are essential in patient care, upholding the ethical principles of their profession and effectively navigating ethical dilemmas. Neglecting ethical issues can lead to inadequate patient care, compromised therapeutic relationships, and moral distress among healthcare workers.
Ethical Concerns in Healthcare:
Nursing Ethical Principles II01:27

Nursing Ethical Principles II

Ethical principles are essential in guiding nurses to fulfill their responsibilities, focusing on the quality of nursing care and decision-making. These principles, including autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, justice, and fidelity, shape the ethical framework within healthcare settings.
Consider the following scenario, which illustrates how these principles are applied in the care of Mr. John, a fifty-year-old teacher diagnosed with metastatic liver cancer.
Initially, Mr. John's cancer...
Standards of Care II01:19

Standards of Care II

Nurses bear specific legal responsibilities under several federal statutes, including:
Continuing Care01:25

Continuing Care

Continuing care describes the variety of health, personal, and social services provided over a prolonged period. The need for continuing care is increasing because people are living longer. Many people do not have families or others to care for them. Continuing care is mainly for patients who are disabled, functionally dependent, or suffering from a terminal disease. It is available within institutional settings or in homes. Examples include nursing centers or facilities, assisted living,...
Psychosurgery01:30

Psychosurgery

Psychosurgery, the surgical alteration or permanent removal of brain tissue to alleviate severe psychological conditions, stands as one of the most radical and controversial treatments in the history of mental health care. Its development and application have evolved significantly, marked by dramatic shifts in scientific understanding and ethical perspectives.
Historical Development of Psychosurgery
In the 1930s, Portuguese neurologist Antonio Egas Moniz introduced a surgical procedure designed...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Antimicrobial stewardship for sepsis in the intensive care unit: Survey of critical care and infectious diseases physicians.

Infection control and hospital epidemiology·2022
Same author

Hemodilution Then Hemoconcentration after Resuscitation of Patients with Severe Sepsis or Septic Shock.

Connecticut medicine·2018
Same author

A video depicting resuscitation did not impact upon patients' decision-making.

International journal of general medicine·2018
Same author

Is failure to awaken and wean malpractice?

Journal of critical care·2016
Same author

Tardive tachypnea.

Intensive care medicine·2016
Same author

Influenza SIRS with Minimal Pneumonitis.

Frontiers in medicine·2016

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 24, 2026

Setup and Execution of the Rapid Cycle Deliberate Practice Death Notification Curriculum
04:36

Setup and Execution of the Rapid Cycle Deliberate Practice Death Notification Curriculum

Published on: August 5, 2020

Why not physician-assisted death?

Constantine A Manthous1

  • 1Bridgeport Hospital and Yale University School of Medicine, Bridgeport, CT, USA. pcmant@bpthosp.org

Critical Care Medicine
|March 28, 2009
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Physician-assisted death is widely rejected due to complex, often irrational, factors rooted in religion, medical ethics, and law. This aversion may unnecessarily limit patient autonomy in terminal cases.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 24, 2026

Setup and Execution of the Rapid Cycle Deliberate Practice Death Notification Curriculum
04:36

Setup and Execution of the Rapid Cycle Deliberate Practice Death Notification Curriculum

Published on: August 5, 2020

Area of Science:

  • Medical Ethics
  • Bioethics
  • Philosophy of Medicine

Background:

  • The Hippocratic Oath historically prohibits providing lethal drugs, influencing contemporary medical views.
  • Physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia evoke strong negative reactions from both medical professionals and the public.
  • Understanding the basis of this aversion is crucial for ethical medical practice and patient care.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore the multifaceted origins of the aversion to physician-assisted death.
  • To examine the roles of religion, Western medical traditions, legal frameworks, and moral neurocognition in shaping this stance.
  • To analyze whether current rejections of physician-assisted death are always rational or if they may impede patient liberty.

Main Methods:

  • A comprehensive review of religious texts was conducted.
  • Legal opinions and historical medical ethics manifestos were analyzed.
  • Relevant medical and lay literature were synthesized to understand societal perspectives.

Main Results:

  • The collective rejection of physician-assisted death stems from a complex interplay of factors.
  • These contributing factors are not always based on purely rational considerations.
  • The study identifies religious doctrines, established medical norms, legal precedents, and evolving neurocognitive insights as key influences.

Conclusions:

  • The deep-seated aversion to physician-assisted death has intricate, often non-rational, origins.
  • A strict rejection may unduly restrict the autonomy of a small patient group.
  • Careful consideration of persistent patient requests, after exhausting all treatments, suggests potential for reconsidering the absolute prohibition.