Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 24, 2026

Dry Powder and Nebulized Aerosol Inhalation of Pharmaceuticals Delivered to Mice Using a Nose-only Exposure System
Published on: April 6, 2017
A comparison of respiratory care workload with 2 different nebulizers
Edward R Hoisington1, Robert L Chatburn, James K Stoller
1Respiratory Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Avenue, A90, Cleveland OH 44195, USA. hoisine@ccf.org
Unlabelled:
Aerosol therapy via small-volume nebulizer (SVN) accounts for a large proportion of the respiratory care workload. Treatment time is mostly nebulization time, which is highly variable, depending on SVN design. We studied the workload effect of adopting a faster nebulizer. We hypothesized that time saved by faster SVN treatment can be used by respiratory therapists for other patient-care activities.
Methods:
We compared day-shift workload distribution in a post-thoracic-surgery ward during 2 consecutive 30-day periods. To deliver bronchodilators (3 mL unit dose), during the baseline period we used the VixOne nebulizer (average nebulization time 9 min), and during the intervention period we used the NebuTech HDN (nebulization time limited to 3 min). We recorded the per-shift number of various respiratory-therapy procedures, which have been assigned standard treatment times, and compared the per-shift numbers of procedures during the baseline and intervention periods.
Results:
The per-shift number of procedures were similar during the baseline and intervention periods (33.8/shift vs 33.3/shift, P = .68), as was the per-shift number of SVN treatments (11.9/shift vs 11.8/shift, respectively, P = .81). The per-shift time required for the procedures was greater during the baseline period (4.7 h vs 3.6 h, P < .001). The per-shift time available to deliver optional value-added respiratory therapies was higher in the intervention period (0.75 h vs 0.50 h, P < .04). The time savings from the faster nebulizer corresponded to 1.8 full-time equivalents and theoretical net annual savings of $66,491. We did not use treatment "stacking" (ie, simultaneous administration of SVN treatments to multiple patients).
Conclusions:
The NebuTech HDN substantially reduces SVN-administration time, without adverse effects or events, and the time savings were used for value-added patient-care activities. Shorter treatment times can play a role in coping with the national shortage of qualified respiratory therapists.
Related Concept Videos
Inhaled Medications
Oxygen Delivering System I: Nasal Cannula and Face Mask
Nasal Cannula
A nasal cannula is a lightweight tube split at one end into two prongs and placed in the nostrils. It is typically used to deliver low to medium levels of oxygen.
Suggested flow rate: The suggested flow rate for a nasal cannula typically ranges between 1 and 6 L/min.
Oxygen percentage setting:...
Respiratory Capacities
One key metric is the Inspiratory Capacity (IC), which represents the maximum amount of air that can be inhaled with full effort. IC is calculated by summing the tidal volume and inspiratory reserve volume, typically ranging from 2.4 to 3.6 liters.
The Functional Residual Capacity (FRC) represents the air in the...
Respiratory Volumes
Tidal Volume (TV) Tidal volume (TV) is the air inhaled or exhaled in a...
Administering Oxygen by Nasal Cannula
Nasal Cannulas
A nasal cannula is a lightweight tube split into two prongs placed in the nostrils, connected...
Respiratory Volumes and Capacities I

