Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 24, 2026
Preparation and Using Phantom Lesions to Practice Fine Needle Aspiration Biopsies
Published on: September 29, 2009
A single ThinPrep slide may not be representative in all head and neck fine needle aspirate specimens
C E Anderson1, E Duvall, W A Wallace
1Department of Pathology, Laboratories Directorate, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Objectives:
Ideally, head and neck aspiration should be performed by trained aspirators within the setting of a one-stop clinic, where smeared material is available for immediate assessment. However, this may not always be possible for practical reasons and the use of liquid-based techniques in head and neck cytology is increasing. Although liquid-based cytology has been extensively validated for use in gynaecological cytology, no studies have investigated whether or not a single ThinPrep slide is representative for head and neck aspirate specimens. We performed a prospective audit of head and neck fine needle aspiration specimens processed by the ThinPrep method to investigate whether a single ThinPrep slide was representative.
Methods:
A prospective audit of 115 consecutive head and neck aspirates was carried out. A single ThinPrep slide was prepared and a diagnosis recorded. The remainder of the specimen was then spun down and prepared as a cell block. The ThinPrep and cell block diagnoses were compared.
Results:
In 36 cases (31%), the cell block provided additional information that contributed to the diagnosis. In 14 (12%), the cell block was regarded as essential to the diagnosis.
Conclusions:
A single ThinPrep slide may not provide representative diagnostic material in all head and neck aspirates. This should be taken into consideration when contemplating the use of liquid-based methods for non-gynaecological cytology.
