Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Masking and Demasking Agents01:19

Masking and Demasking Agents

EDTA titrations may necessitate masking and demasking agents to temporarily protect a particular metal ion in a mixture from the EDTA reaction. These agents facilitate the sequential analysis of the metal ions by forming stable complexes with some—but not all—metal ions during certain steps.
There are many masking agents, such as cyanide, fluoride, triethanolamine, thiourea, and 2,3-bis(sulfanyl)propan-1-ol (formerly 2,3-dimercapto-1-propanol), with the masking agent chosen based on the metal...
Modified-Release Drug Delivery Systems: Stimuli-Activated01:30

Modified-Release Drug Delivery Systems: Stimuli-Activated

Stimuli-activated drug delivery systems are designed to release drugs in response to specific physical, chemical, or biological stimuli. These systems often utilize hydrogels—three-dimensional, hydrophilic polymer networks capable of swelling in aqueous environments and retaining significant fluid volumes. Upon exposure to particular stimuli, these hydrogels undergo structural transitions that allow the embedded drug to be released. Due to this adaptive behavior, such systems are also called...
Nondepolarizing (Competitive) Neuromuscular Blockers: Mechanism of Action01:17

Nondepolarizing (Competitive) Neuromuscular Blockers: Mechanism of Action

Nondepolarizing neuromuscular blockers induce paralysis by competitively blocking nicotinic acetylcholine receptors at the muscle end plate. Examples include pancuronium, mivacurium, vecuronium, and rocuronium. These quaternary ammonium derivatives are administered intravenously, are poorly absorbed, and are excreted via the kidneys.
Competitive antagonists prevent acetylcholine from binding to its receptor, inhibiting membrane depolarization. Without conformational changes or intrinsic...
GPCR Desensitization01:12

GPCR Desensitization

G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) signaling plays a crucial role in cell functioning. GPCR desensitization is an equally essential process. It allows cells to respond to changing environments and regain sensitivity to new stimuli while preventing unnecessary stimulation when no longer needed. Prolonged exposure to stimuli leads to GPCR desensitization. It involves blocking the receptors from binding and activating additional G proteins. This inhibits activation of downstream effectors, thereby...
Local Anesthetics: Mechanism of Action01:23

Local Anesthetics: Mechanism of Action

Local anesthetics (LAs) block sensory and motor impulses by inhibiting the sodium channels on the nerve cell membranes. This induces temporary loss of sensation, relieving pain in a specific body area.
Local anesthetics are amphiphilic molecules consisting of a hydrophobic aromatic part linked to a hydrophilic group by an ester or amide linkage. They are weak bases and are usually available as salts, which increases their solubility and stability. Once administered, LAs exist in the body either...
Drugs Acting on Autonomic Ganglia: Blockers01:28

Drugs Acting on Autonomic Ganglia: Blockers

Ganglionic blockers inhibit autonomic activity by blocking nicotinic receptors in the autonomic ganglia, suppressing impulse transmission. These blockers lack selectivity between sympathetic and parasympathetic ganglia and are ineffective as neuromuscular junction antagonists. They can be categorized into two groups:

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Temporal integration of infrasound at threshold.

PloS one·2023
Same author

The effect of sensorineural hearing loss on suprathreshold perception of tonal components in noise.

JASA express letters·2023
Same author

Modelling suppression and comodulation masking release using the dual-resonance nonlinear filter.

JASA express letters·2022
Same author

Effect of Contralateral Noise on Speech Intelligibility.

Neuroscience·2021
Same author

Comodulation masking release with random variations of flanking-band center frequencies.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2020
Same author

The effect of silent gaps on temporal weights in loudness judgments.

Hearing research·2020
Same journal

Estimation of hair cell loss from audiograms.

Hearing research·2026
Same journal

Cochlear size variation in a large-scale international multicentre cohort.

Hearing research·2026
Same journal

Estimation of minor-to-moderate conductive hearing loss with distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in humans.

Hearing research·2026
Same journal

Effects of early hearing deficits on olivocochlear efferent neuron morphology in mice.

Hearing research·2026
Same journal

Cochlear aging after synaptopathic noise: age-noise interactions in hair cell loss and axonal degeneration.

Hearing research·2026
Same journal

MERGE: Misophonia and emotion regulation in a guided experience sampling study.

Hearing research·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 24, 2026

Methods for the Discovery of Novel Compounds Modulating a Gamma-Aminobutyric Acid Receptor Type A Neurotransmission
07:16

Methods for the Discovery of Novel Compounds Modulating a Gamma-Aminobutyric Acid Receptor Type A Neurotransmission

Published on: August 16, 2018

Comodulation masking release for regular and irregular modulators.

Jesko L Verhey1, Stephan M A Ernst

  • 1Neurosensorik, Institut für Physik, Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Oldenburg D-26111, Germany. jesko.verhey@uni-oldenburg.de

Hearing Research
|April 4, 2009
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study found that comodulation masking release (CMR) is not solely dependent on modulator regularity. Within-channel cues significantly contribute to CMR, challenging existing hypotheses about modulator type differences.

More Related Videos

Automated Multimodal Stimulation and Simultaneous Neuronal Recording from Multiple Small Organisms
08:28

Automated Multimodal Stimulation and Simultaneous Neuronal Recording from Multiple Small Organisms

Published on: March 3, 2023

Testing Tactile Masking between the Forearms
08:05

Testing Tactile Masking between the Forearms

Published on: February 10, 2016

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 24, 2026

Methods for the Discovery of Novel Compounds Modulating a Gamma-Aminobutyric Acid Receptor Type A Neurotransmission
07:16

Methods for the Discovery of Novel Compounds Modulating a Gamma-Aminobutyric Acid Receptor Type A Neurotransmission

Published on: August 16, 2018

Automated Multimodal Stimulation and Simultaneous Neuronal Recording from Multiple Small Organisms
08:28

Automated Multimodal Stimulation and Simultaneous Neuronal Recording from Multiple Small Organisms

Published on: March 3, 2023

Testing Tactile Masking between the Forearms
08:05

Testing Tactile Masking between the Forearms

Published on: February 10, 2016

Area of Science:

  • Auditory Neuroscience
  • Psychoacoustics
  • Signal Processing

Background:

  • Comodulation masking release (CMR) is a phenomenon in auditory perception.
  • Existing theories suggest modulator regularity influences CMR.
  • The role of envelope distributions in CMR requires further investigation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether differences in CMR across modulator types are due to regularity or envelope distributions.
  • To test the hypothesis that modulator regularity is the primary factor in CMR variations.
  • To differentiate the contributions of within-channel and across-channel cues to CMR.

Main Methods:

  • Measuring thresholds of a sinusoidal signal with a noise masker (broadband or narrow band).
  • Utilizing a square-wave modulator with varying degrees of regularity while preserving envelope distribution.
  • Analyzing CMR under narrow-band conditions mimicking auditory frequency selectivity or preserving modulation spectrum.
  • Comparing results with within-channel models incorporating peripheral nonlinearity or modulation filterbanks.

Main Results:

  • CMR did not decrease with decreasing modulator regularity, refuting the regularity hypothesis.
  • Narrow-band conditions indicated that within-channel cues are the primary source of CMR.
  • Within-channel models accurately predicted CMR size for narrow-band conditions.
  • Broadband masker CMR increased with decreasing regularity, contradicting model predictions and narrow-band findings.

Conclusions:

  • Modulator regularity is not the sole determinant of CMR differences.
  • Within-channel processing plays a significant role in CMR, particularly in narrow-band conditions.
  • Envelope distributions alone do not fully explain CMR, especially in broadband masking scenarios.
  • Further research is needed to reconcile broadband and narrow-band CMR findings.