Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Introduction to Nonparametric Statistics01:28

Introduction to Nonparametric Statistics

Nonparametric statistics offer a powerful alternative to traditional parametric methods, useful when assumptions about the population distribution cannot be made. Unlike parametric tests, which require data to follow a specific distribution with well-defined parameters (such as the mean and standard deviation), nonparametric tests do not require such constraints. This makes them particularly valuable when dealing with small sample sizes, skewed data, or ordinal and categorical variables.
One of...
Confidence Intervals01:21

Confidence Intervals

An unbiased point estimate is often insufficient to predict a population estimate, such as population mean or population proportion. In this scenario, a confidence interval is used. A confidence interval is an estimate similar to a sample proportion. However, unlike the point estimate which is a single value, the confidence interval contains a range of values. These values have lower and upper limits, known as confidence limits, and can be designated as L1 and L2, respectively.
A confidence...
Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data01:16

Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data

Statistical inference techniques, paramount in hypothesis testing, differentiate into two broad categories: parametric and nonparametric statistics.
Parametric statistics, as the name suggests, assumes that data follow a specific distribution, often a normal distribution. This assumption enables robust hypothesis testing and estimation. Parametric methods, like the Student's t-test or Goodness-of-fit test, are frequently employed in biostatistics due to their robustness. For instance, comparing...
Interpretation of Confidence Intervals01:19

Interpretation of Confidence Intervals

A confidence interval is a better estimate of the population than a point estimate, as it uses a range of values from a sample instead of a single value.
Confidence intervals have confidence coefficients that are crucial for their interpretation. The most common confidence coefficients are 0.90, 0.95, and 0.99, which can be written as percentages–90%, 95%, and 99%, respectively.
Suppose a person calculates a confidence interval with a confidence coefficient of 0.95. In that case, they can...
Confidence Interval for Estimating Population Mean01:25

Confidence Interval for Estimating Population Mean

A point estimate of the population mean is obtained from a single sample. Such a point estimate does not represent a population well because it needs to account for variability in the population. Single point estimate can also be biased despite the sample being selected randomly. Thus, a point estimate is often unreliable. A confidence interval is needed to reduce this unreliability.
A confidence interval for the mean is a range of values that provides an estimate of the population mean. As the...
Confidence Coefficient01:24

Confidence Coefficient

The confidence coefficient is also known as the confidence level or degree of confidence. It is the percent expression for the probability, 1-α, that the confidence interval contains the true population parameter assuming that the confidence interval is obtained after sufficient unbiased sampling; for example, if the CL = 90%, then in 90 out of 100 samples the interval estimate will enclose the true population parameter. Here α is the area under the curve, distributed equally under both the...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Methodological quality of cardiac CT and MRI radiomics studies assessed using METRICS and RQS by human readers and ChatGPT 5.1 Thinking.

European radiology experimental·2026
Same author

Reply to the Letter to the Editor: CT-guided lung biopsy in patients with interstitial lung abnormalities.

European radiology·2026
Same author

CT-guided core needle biopsy of focal pulmonary lesions with coexisting interstitial lung abnormalities: a case-control study.

European radiology·2026
Same author

Multicenter external validation of a novel aggregated technique for percutaneous CT guided lung biopsy for multiple samplings: the ExtraPEARL study.

European radiology·2025
Same author

CT-guided transthoracic needle biopsy: How we do it.

European journal of radiology·2025
Same author

Serendipitous Adrenal Hyperplasia in Patients Admitted to the Emergency Department for Suspected SARS-CoV-2 Infection is Linked to Increased Mortality.

Archives of medical research·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 24, 2026

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

[Non-parametric methods for estimating confidence intervals around the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio].

Michele Petrinco1, Dario Gregori, Fulvio Lazzarato

  • 1Dipartimento di sanità pubblica e microbiologia, Università di Torino.

Epidemiologia E Prevenzione
|April 10, 2009
PubMed
Summary

Non-parametric bootstrap methods are crucial for estimating the Incremental Cost Effectiveness Ratio (ICER) and its confidence interval in randomized clinical trials. Different methods yield varying results, impacting study interpretation in cost-effectiveness analysis.

More Related Videos

Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task
07:47

Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task

Published on: January 9, 2016

The Adjuvant Efficacy of Angong Niuhuang Pill in the Treatment of Viral Encephalitis: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
08:36

The Adjuvant Efficacy of Angong Niuhuang Pill in the Treatment of Viral Encephalitis: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Published on: April 19, 2024

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 24, 2026

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model
05:37

An R-Based Landscape Validation of a Competing Risk Model

Published on: September 16, 2022

Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task
07:47

Measuring Delay Discounting in Humans Using an Adjusting Amount Task

Published on: January 9, 2016

The Adjuvant Efficacy of Angong Niuhuang Pill in the Treatment of Viral Encephalitis: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
08:36

The Adjuvant Efficacy of Angong Niuhuang Pill in the Treatment of Viral Encephalitis: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Published on: April 19, 2024

Area of Science:

  • Health economics
  • Biostatistics
  • Clinical trial methodology

Context:

  • Cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) is increasingly integrated into randomized clinical trials (RCTs).
  • Accurate estimation of the Incremental Cost Effectiveness Ratio (ICER) and its confidence interval is statistically challenging.
  • Non-parametric methods, particularly bootstrap approaches, are vital for robust CEA in clinical research.

Purpose:

  • To present key non-parametric bootstrap methods for ICER confidence interval estimation.
  • To illustrate these methods using data from an RCT on hepatocellular carcinoma treatment.
  • To highlight the impact of method choice on study findings.

Summary:

  • The study reviews non-parametric bootstrap methods for calculating ICER confidence intervals in RCTs.
  • These methods were applied to a real-world clinical trial comparing treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma.
  • Significant variations in confidence interval estimates were observed across different non-parametric approaches.

Impact:

  • Demonstrates that the choice of non-parametric method can influence the statistical significance and interpretation of CEA results.
  • Provides practical insights for researchers conducting economic evaluations alongside clinical trials.
  • Emphasizes the importance of rigorous statistical methodology in health economics and clinical decision-making.