Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 24, 2026

The Modified Temptation Resistance Task: A Paradigm to Elicit Children's Strategic Lie-telling
Published on: April 6, 2018
Analyses of mental contamination: Part I, experimental manipulations of morality
Corinna M Elliott1, Adam S Radomsky
1Department of Psychology, Concordia University, 7141 Sherbrooke St. West, Montreal, QC, H4B 1R6, Canada.
Abstract:
The fear of contamination is thought to be comprised of two separate but related fears: those pertaining to physical and mental contamination. Previous research on mental contamination involved studies in which more than one independent variable was manipulated simultaneously. In particular, an immoral act (e.g., a non-consensual kiss) had been coupled with an immoral man (e.g., the person who forces the kiss) in each manipulation. The purpose of this study was to separate manipulations of the immorality of the man from the immorality of the act. Female undergraduate students (n=148) listened to an audio recording and imagined that they were experiencing either sharing a consensual kiss with a man described as moral or immoral, or receiving a forced, non-consensual kiss from a man described as moral or immoral. Participants indicated the presence and degree of mental contamination and then completed a behavioural task for which spontaneous washing was recorded. Results indicated that a non-consensual kiss evoked greater feelings of mental contamination than a consensual kiss. In particular, participants who imagined a non-consensual kiss from a man described as either moral or immoral reported the greatest feelings of mental contamination, whereas participants who imagined a consensual kiss from a man described as moral reported the least. Results are discussed in terms of cognitive-behavioural conceptualizations of and treatments for contamination fears.
Insights
Non-consensual acts cause greater mental contamination than consensual ones, regardless of the perpetrator's morality. This research separates act and actor morality in contamination studies.
Area of Science:
- Psychology
- Social Psychology
- Clinical Psychology
Background:
- Fear of contamination comprises physical and mental contamination.
- Prior research confounded act and actor morality in mental contamination studies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To disentangle the effects of act morality versus actor morality on mental contamination.
- To investigate the impact of consensual versus non-consensual acts, and moral versus immoral actors, on mental contamination.
Main Methods:
- 148 female undergraduates listened to scenarios involving consensual or non-consensual kisses from moral or immoral men.
- Participants rated their mental contamination and underwent a behavioral task measuring spontaneous washing.
Main Results:
- Non-consensual kisses induced significantly higher mental contamination than consensual kisses.
- The greatest mental contamination was reported following non-consensual kisses, irrespective of the man's morality.
- Consensual kisses with a moral man elicited the least mental contamination.
Conclusions:
- The nature of the act (non-consensual) is a stronger predictor of mental contamination than the actor's morality.
- Findings inform cognitive-behavioral models and treatments for contamination fears.
More Related Videos
06:42Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation of the Posterior Medial Frontal Cortex to Experimentally Reduce Ideological Threat Responses
Published on: September 28, 2018
09:14Exploring the Neural Correlates of Cognitive Reappraisal in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Using Task-based Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Published on: March 14, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Kohlberg's Theory of Moral Development
Pre-Conventional Level
At the pre-conventional level, morality is primarily driven by personal consequences. In Stage...
Ethics in Research
Social Foundations of Self II: The Generalized Other
The Stanford Prison Experiment
Milgram's Obedience to Authority
Self-Awareness and Its Effects