Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 24, 2026

Cutoff Value of Phase Angle by Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis at Admission as a Prognostic Factor in Patients with Acute Heart Failure
Published on: June 10, 2025
Prognostic factors in chronic heart failure. A review of serum biomarkers, metabolic changes, symptoms, and scoring
Mitja Lainscak1, Stefan D Anker
1Division of Cardiology, University Clinic of Respiratory and Allergic Diseases, Golnik, Slovenia. mitja.lainscak@guest.arnes.si
Insights
Making treatment decisions for chronic heart failure (CHF) is complex. This review examines routine clinical parameters, like biomarkers and exercise capacity, for risk stratification in CHF patients, though more research is needed.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Clinical Medicine
- Biomarkers
Background:
- Chronic heart failure (CHF) management involves complex decision-making due to numerous therapeutic options with marginal benefits.
- Accurate risk stratification is crucial for optimizing CHF patient care.
- There is a need for accessible and clinically valuable parameters beyond sophisticated procedures.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the importance and validity of routinely available clinical parameters for risk stratification in chronic heart failure (CHF).
- To assess the utility of serum biomarkers, metabolic changes, symptom status, exercise capacity, and prognostic scoring systems in CHF management.
Main Methods:
- Literature review of existing studies on prognostic markers in chronic heart failure.
- Analysis of the clinical value of serum biomarkers (natriuretic peptides, uric acid, lipoproteins, cytokines).
- Evaluation of metabolic factors (insulin resistance, BMI), patient-reported symptoms, exercise capacity, and prognostic scoring systems.
Main Results:
- Routinely available clinical parameters, including serum biomarkers and patient measures, hold potential clinical value for CHF risk stratification.
- Limited evidence currently supports the use of prognostic markers to improve treatment decisions and patient outcomes in CHF.
- Further research is required to establish the definitive role of these markers in guiding CHF therapy.
Conclusions:
- Accessible clinical parameters offer a promising avenue for risk stratification in chronic heart failure (CHF).
- The current evidence base is insufficient to confirm that using prognostic markers in treatment decisions improves CHF outcomes.
- Extensive further investigation is necessary to validate and implement these markers effectively in clinical practice for CHF.
Abstract:
Decision-making in the care for patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) has become increasingly difficult. The many available therapeutic strategies and novel treatment modalities with borderline or modest benefit call for careful risk stratification in patients with CHF. Rather than relying on highly sophisticated and expensive procedures, we may find routinely available parameters of clinical value. This review considers the importance and validity of serum biomarkers (like natriuretic peptides, uric acid, lipoproteins, and cytokines), metabolic changes (like insulin resistance or body mass index), patient measures of symptom status and exercise capacity, as well as prognostic scoring systems. There is limited evidence that the use of prognostic markers to make treatment decisions improves the outcome in CHF. Many studies still need to be done to this end.
Related Concept Videos
Pathophysiology of Heart Failure
Blood Studies for Cardiovascular System II: CRP, Hcy, and Cardiac Natriuretic Peptide Markers
These markers indicate stress or strain on the heart muscle:
Natriuretic Peptides (BNP)
Cardiac myocytes produce these hormones in response to ventricular stretching...
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology
Heart Failure VII: Nursing Interventions
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation
Heart Failure I: Introduction