Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 24, 2026

08:53
Randomized, Triple-Blind, and Parallel-Controlled Trial of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Cognitive Rehabilitation after Stroke
Published on: June 6, 2025
Interventions for apathy after traumatic brain injury.
Amanda Lane-Brown1, Robyn Tate
1Rehabilitation Studies Unit, University of Sydney and Royal Rehabilitation Centre Sydney, P.O. Box 6, Ryde, New South Wales, Australia, 1680. amandal@med.usyd.edu.au
The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
|April 17, 2009
Summary
Apathy after traumatic brain injury (TBI) is common. One study suggests cranial electrotherapy stimulation (CES) may reduce inertia, a component of apathy, but more research is needed.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Rehabilitation Medicine
- Clinical Psychology
Background:
- Apathy, characterized by reduced motivation and goal-directed behavior, is a frequent and impactful consequence of traumatic brain injury (TBI).
- Systematic reviews are crucial for evaluating interventions aimed at mitigating apathy in TBI survivors.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review the effectiveness of interventions for apathy in adults with TBI.
- To assess changes in behavioral, cognitive, and emotional measures of apathy following interventions.
Main Methods:
- Searched multiple databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, etc.) up to January 2008 and January 2009 for relevant studies.
- Included only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) specifically targeting apathy in individuals with TBI.
- Two authors independently assessed study eligibility, methodological quality, and extracted data.
Main Results:
- One RCT involving 21 participants met the inclusion criteria.
- Cranial electrotherapy stimulation (CES) was associated with a decrease in inertia, a component of apathy.
- No significant changes were observed in sham or no-treatment control groups, but between-group analyses were not reported.
Conclusions:
- The current evidence does not support the use of CES for treating apathy or its components in TBI patients.
- The single trial's small sample size and lack of between-group statistical analysis limit the ability to determine treatment efficacy.
- Further high-quality RCTs with larger sample sizes and robust statistical methods are needed to evaluate apathy interventions in TBI.