Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 23, 2026

05:02
Comparing Bibliometric Analysis Using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science Databases
Published on: October 24, 2019
Arab nations lagging behind other Middle Eastern countries in biomedical research: a comparative study
Hani T S Benamer1, Omran Bakoush
1Department of Nephrology, Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden. benamer@doctors.org.uk
BMC Medical Research Methodology
|April 21, 2009
Summary
Biomedical research output from Arab nations is significantly lower in both quantity and quality compared to non-Arab Middle Eastern countries. Further studies are needed to identify causes and improve the status of Arab biomedical research.
Area of Science:
- Biomedical research performance analysis.
- Comparative bibliometric study.
Background:
- Monitoring research progress and trends is crucial for national development.
- Assessing biomedical research output provides insights into scientific productivity.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the performance of biomedical research in the Arab world from 2001 to 2005.
- To compare the Arab world's biomedical research output with non-Arab Middle Eastern countries.
Main Methods:
- Systematic search of PubMed and Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-expanded).
- Inclusion of 16 Arab nations and three non-Arab Middle Eastern countries (Iran, Israel, Turkey).
- Analysis of original biomedical research publications and citation frequencies.
Main Results:
- Arab countries produced significantly fewer publications (5,775-14,374) than non-Arab Middle Eastern countries (25,643-49,110).
- Normalized data (per capita, GDP) also showed lower performance for Arab nations.
- Publications from Arab countries had significantly lower citation frequencies.
Conclusions:
- The Arab world lags behind other Middle Eastern countries in biomedical publication quantity and quality.
- Further research is required to understand the reasons for this disparity.
- Strategies are needed to enhance the biomedical research landscape in Arab countries.
Related Concept Videos
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:
Surveys
Often, psychologists develop surveys as a means of gathering data. Surveys are lists of questions to be answered by research participants, and can be delivered as paper-and-pencil questionnaires, administered electronically, or conducted verbally. Generally, the survey itself can be completed in a short time, and the ease of administering a survey makes it easy to collect data from a large number of people.