Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 23, 2026
08:24
The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: August 25, 2023
Feedback-related negativity effects vanished with false or monetary loss choice
Peng Li1, Jiajin Yuan, Shiwei Jia
1Key Laboratory of Cognition and Personality (SWU), Ministry of Education and School of Psychology, Southwest University, Chongqing, China.
Neuroreport
|April 22, 2009
Summary
Feedback-related negativity (FRN) reflects how the brain processes losses and response correctness. This study found FRN is influenced by both monetary outcomes and the accuracy of a participant's guess in a gambling task.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Cognitive Psychology
- Decision Making
Background:
- The feedback-related negativity (FRN) is an event-related potential sensitive to negative feedback, particularly monetary loss.
- Understanding the precise factors modulating FRN amplitude is crucial for cognitive neuroscience and understanding decision-making processes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the interplay between feedback valence (gain/loss) and response correctness in modulating the feedback-related negativity (FRN).
- To determine if FRN amplitude is influenced by the utilitarian value of feedback in a gambling context.
Main Methods:
- Participants engaged in a gambling task involving card choices with unpredictable monetary gains or losses.
- Feedback indicated monetary outcome and response correctness.
- Electroencephalography (EEG) was used to measure event-related potentials, specifically focusing on FRN amplitudes.
Main Results:
- Larger FRN amplitudes were observed for losses versus gains when participants guessed correctly.
- Greater FRN amplitudes occurred for incorrect versus correct choices when participants gained money.
- FRN effects were diminished following incorrect choices that resulted in losses.
Conclusions:
- The feedback-related negativity (FRN) appears to reflect an interaction between the correctness of a guess and the utilitarian value of the feedback received.
- FRN is not solely driven by monetary loss but is modulated by the cognitive evaluation of the feedback's significance.
Related Concept Videos
01:14Avoidance Learning and Learned Helplessness
Avoidance learning and learned helplessness are critical concepts in understanding behavioral responses to negative stimuli.
Avoidance learning occurs when an organism learns that a specific behavior can prevent an unpleasant outcome. For example, a student who receives a bad grade may start studying harder to avoid future poor grades. This behavior persists even when the negative outcome is no longer present. Avoidance learning is powerful because it maintains behavior in the absence of the...
Avoidance learning occurs when an organism learns that a specific behavior can prevent an unpleasant outcome. For example, a student who receives a bad grade may start studying harder to avoid future poor grades. This behavior persists even when the negative outcome is no longer present. Avoidance learning is powerful because it maintains behavior in the absence of the...
01:14Fundamental Attribution Error
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is called the fundamental attribution...
03:26Framing Effects
Information is everywhere and its presentation—such as how and when items are presented—can impact our perceptions and decisions surrounding the info. This broad concept umbrellas framing effects—influences that occur due to the way information is framed in its appearance, whether it’s purely the order or the specific wording of a message. Let’s take a look at numerous ways in which two versions of something can objectively say the same thing, yet we respond in different ways based on the...
01:19Counterfactual Thinking
Counterfactual thinking is a cognitive process wherein individuals mentally reconstruct alternative versions of past events, often beginning with “what if” or “if only.” This reflective mechanism plays a significant role in shaping emotional experiences and guiding future behavior. Though typically triggered by unfavorable or unexpected outcomes, counterfactual thinking can also emerge in mundane, everyday decisions and experiences, revealing its deep entrenchment in human cognition.Types of...
01:12Hindsight Biases
Hindsight bias leads you to believe that the event you just experienced was predictable, even though it really wasn’t. In other words, you knew all along that things would turn out the way they did. Can you relate this to the phrase "Hindsight is 20/20" now?
01:18False Memories
False memories represent a cognitive distortion in which individuals recall events that did not happen, or remember them in an altered form. This phenomenon highlights the brain's constructive nature in processing and recalling memories, emphasizing that memory is not a perfect representation of past events but rather a dynamic reconstruction influenced by various factors.
One primary source of false memories is misattribution, where individuals incorrectly associate external information with...
One primary source of false memories is misattribution, where individuals incorrectly associate external information with...