Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 23, 2026

Athymic Rat Model for Evaluation of Engineered Anterior Cruciate Ligament Grafts
10:32

Athymic Rat Model for Evaluation of Engineered Anterior Cruciate Ligament Grafts

Published on: March 26, 2015

Avoiding pitfalls in anatomic ACL reconstruction.

Alexis Chiang Colvin1, Wei Shen, Volker Musahl

  • 1Department of Orthopaedics, Mount Sinai Medical Center, New York, NY 10029, USA. Alexis.colvin@mountsinai.org

Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy : Official Journal of the ESSKA
|April 29, 2009
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Treatment after anterior cruciate ligament injury: Panther Symposium ACL Treatment Consensus Group.

Journal of ISAKOS : joint disorders & orthopaedic sports medicine·2021
Same author

Anatomic single vs. double-bundle ACL reconstruction: a randomized clinical trial-Part 1: clinical outcomes.

Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA·2021
Same author

Return to preinjury sports after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is predicted by five independent factors.

Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA·2021
Same author

Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis Contributes Little to Change In Vivo Kinematics After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

The American journal of sports medicine·2021
Same author

Paediatric knee anterolateral capsule does not contain a distinct ligament: analysis of histology, immunohistochemistry and gene expression.

Journal of ISAKOS : joint disorders & orthopaedic sports medicine·2021
Same author

The radiographic tibial spine area is correlated with the occurrence of ACL injury.

Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA·2021
Same journal

Patients with obesity have a higher risk of periprosthetic joint infection and more frequent polymicrobial infections after knee arthroplasty: A nationwide register-based study from Denmark.

Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA·2026
Same journal

Defining sagittal knee phenotypes via monopedal static anterior tibial translation. Part 2: The assessment-led personalization (ALP) system for indication and correction target planning in slope-reducing osteotomy.

Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA·2026
Same journal

High failure rate after all-inside revision meniscal repair: Female sex and absence of ACL reconstruction increase risk.

Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA·2026
Same journal

Artificial intelligence demonstrates comparable diagnostic accuracy to radiologists for anterior cruciate ligament tears on MRI: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA·2026
Same journal

Similar quadriceps strength recovery after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with rectus femoris, quadriceps tendon and hamstring autografts.

Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA·2026
Same journal

Sagittal femoral morphology is not associated with robotic planning or soft-tissue balance during robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty: An analysis from the Brescia Knee Research Group.

Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA·2026
See all related articles

Anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction requires careful technique to avoid common errors. Avoiding these mistakes ensures a successful ACL surgery and restores knee function.

Area of Science:

  • Orthopedic Surgery
  • Sports Medicine
  • Biomechanical Engineering

Background:

  • Increasing interest in double-bundle (DB) anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction necessitates refined surgical techniques.
  • Anatomic reconstruction aims to replicate the native ACL's function and insertion sites.
  • Potential pitfalls exist in DB ACL reconstruction that can compromise outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify and review common mistakes in anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction.
  • To describe methods for avoiding these surgical errors.
  • To emphasize the distinction between standard and anatomic DB ACL reconstruction.

Main Methods:

  • Review of surgical experience and identification of recurring errors in anatomic DB ACL reconstruction.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 23, 2026

Athymic Rat Model for Evaluation of Engineered Anterior Cruciate Ligament Grafts
10:32

Athymic Rat Model for Evaluation of Engineered Anterior Cruciate Ligament Grafts

Published on: March 26, 2015

  • Description of techniques to ensure accurate femoral tunnel visualization and placement.
  • Discussion of strategies to prevent graft impingement and restore native ACL tension.

    • Main Results:

    • Key errors identified include incomplete femoral visualization, reliance on clock-face referencing, nonanatomic tunnel placement, tunnel mismatch, and failure to replicate native tension.
    • Proper technique can mitigate these common mistakes.
    • Distinguishing between standard and anatomic DB ACL reconstruction is crucial.

    Conclusions:

    • Avoiding specific technical errors is paramount for successful anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction.
    • Meticulous attention to femoral visualization, tunnel positioning, and graft tensioning is essential.
    • Anatomic reconstruction offers superior outcomes compared to non-anatomic techniques.