Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

The Behavioral Perspective on Personality01:19

The Behavioral Perspective on Personality

Behaviorists view personality as primarily shaped by environmental reinforcements and consequences. According to this perspective, behavior is influenced by external stimuli, and individuals adjust their actions based on rewards and punishments. Over time, learning histories — accumulated patterns of reinforcement — play a significant role in shaping personality. Behaviors that lead to positive outcomes are reinforced, while those resulting in negative outcomes are diminished. Radical...
Lateralization01:28

Lateralization

Brain lateralization refers to the division of mental processes and functions between the two hemispheres of the brain, a phenomenon that optimizes neural efficiency and underpins complex abilities in humans. This specialization allows each hemisphere to perform tasks where it has a comparative advantage, facilitating more refined cognitive capabilities across different domains.
Introduction to Biological Bases of Psychology01:30

Introduction to Biological Bases of Psychology

Biopsychology serves as a vital bridge connecting the intricate domains of biology and psychology, shedding light on how biological systems influence psychological phenomena. This field scrutinizes the biological substrates of behavior and mental processes, emphasizing the nervous system along with the roles of neurotransmitters, hormones, and genetics. It also incorporates evolutionary perspectives to explain the adaptive nature of mental functions.
The nervous system, the cornerstone of...
Behavior Modification01:21

Behavior Modification

Behavioral approaches have often been criticized for ignoring mental processes and focusing solely on observable behavior. However, these approaches provide an optimistic perspective for individuals seeking to change their behaviors. Rather than concentrating on intrinsic personality traits, behavioral approaches suggest that even longstanding habits can be modified by changing the reward contingencies that maintain them.
A real-world application of operant conditioning principles is applied...
Neuroplasticity01:01

Neuroplasticity

Neuroplasticity reflects the brain's remarkable capacity to adapt and evolve, responding dynamically to learning, experiences, or injury by reorganizing its neural circuitry. This reorganization involves creating new neural connections and refining old ones through a series of biological processes that contribute to the brain's lifelong development and adaptability.
Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the brain can only use...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Probing the causal contribution of premotor and parietal cortex in habit formation and expression.

Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)·2026
Same author

Exploring the link between anticipatory outcome encoding in the brain and goal-directed behavior during outcome devaluation.

Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)·2025
Same author

Progressive Changes Between Thalamic Nuclei and Cortical Networks Across Stimulus-Response Learning.

Human brain mapping·2025
Same author

No evidence for increased habitual or decreased goal-directed action control after acute stress.

PloS one·2025
Same author

Correction to: Initial learning in the brain: From rules to action.

Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)·2025
Same author

Initial learning in the brain: From rules to action.

Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 23, 2026

New Variations for Strategy Set-shifting in the Rat
09:45

New Variations for Strategy Set-shifting in the Rat

Published on: January 23, 2017

Bending the rules: strategic behavioral differences are reflected in the brain.

Uta Wolfensteller1, D Yves von Cramon

  • 1Department of Psychiatry & Psychotherapy, Medical Faculty Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany. uta.wolfensteller@tu-dresden.de

Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
|April 30, 2009
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Investigating higher-order conditional motor behavior using fMRI, this study found that brain activation patterns for second-order stimulus-response (S-R) rules differ based on rule congruency and individual strategies, highlighting the importance of interindividual differences.

More Related Videos

Operant Procedures for Assessing Behavioral Flexibility in Rats
08:30

Operant Procedures for Assessing Behavioral Flexibility in Rats

Published on: February 15, 2015

Assessment of Stress Effects on Cognitive Flexibility using an Operant Strategy Shifting Paradigm
07:26

Assessment of Stress Effects on Cognitive Flexibility using an Operant Strategy Shifting Paradigm

Published on: May 4, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 23, 2026

New Variations for Strategy Set-shifting in the Rat
09:45

New Variations for Strategy Set-shifting in the Rat

Published on: January 23, 2017

Operant Procedures for Assessing Behavioral Flexibility in Rats
08:30

Operant Procedures for Assessing Behavioral Flexibility in Rats

Published on: February 15, 2015

Assessment of Stress Effects on Cognitive Flexibility using an Operant Strategy Shifting Paradigm
07:26

Assessment of Stress Effects on Cognitive Flexibility using an Operant Strategy Shifting Paradigm

Published on: May 4, 2020

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Neuroimaging
  • Human Motor Control

Background:

  • Understanding higher-order conditional motor behavior is crucial for comprehending complex cognitive processes.
  • Previous research has explored first-order stimulus-response (S-R) rules, but the neural underpinnings of second-order rules remain less understood.
  • Individual differences in strategy use can significantly impact cognitive task performance and neural implementation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the neural correlates of implementing higher-order conditional motor behavior.
  • To determine if implementing second-order S-R rules differs based on rule congruency (matching vs. nonmatching) compared to first-order rules.
  • To examine the influence of interindividual behavioral differences and strategy use on the cerebral implementation of second-order rules.

Main Methods:

  • Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was employed to measure brain activity during a higher-order conditional motor behavior task.
  • Participants performed tasks involving first-order and second-order S-R rules with varying congruency conditions.
  • Behavioral data were analyzed to identify distinct subgroups based on strategy use and congruency effects.

Main Results:

  • Second-order rules engaged several cortical areas more intensely than first-order rules.
  • Rule integration based on rule match activated the posterior parietal cortex, while rule mismatch activated the dorsal premotor cortex and left rostrolateral prefrontal cortex.
  • Interindividual strategy differences significantly modulated brain activation, particularly for second-order rules based on rule mismatch.

Conclusions:

  • The cerebral implementation of higher-order S-R rules is differentially activated based on rule congruency and interindividual strategy differences.
  • These findings underscore the necessity of considering interindividual behavioral variations in cognitive neuroscience research.
  • Future research should account for diverse strategy use even in simple experimental paradigms to fully understand cognitive processes.