Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 23, 2026

07:42
Dual-Task Stroop Paradigm for Detecting Cognitive Deficits in High-Functioning Stroke Patients
Published on: December 16, 2022
The impact of multiple sclerosis on patients' performance on the Stroop Test: processing speed versus interference
Douglas R Denney1, Sharon G Lynch
1Department of Psychology, University of Kansas, Lawrence, Kansas 66045-7556, USA. denney@ku.edu
Summary
Multiple sclerosis (MS) patients struggle with the Stroop Test due to processing speed deficits, not interference. Alternative measures show age-related interference, but no group differences in MS patients.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Cognitive Psychology
- Clinical Neurology
Background:
- Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a neurodegenerative disease affecting cognitive functions.
- Stroop Test performance deficits in MS patients are often attributed to impaired processing speed and selective attention.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the specific cognitive deficits in MS patients using the Stroop Test.
- To evaluate different scoring methods for assessing processing speed and interference in MS.
- To determine if Stroop Test difficulties in MS are primarily due to processing speed or interference.
Main Methods:
- Analyzed Stroop Test data from 248 MS patients and 178 controls.
- Utilized various scoring formulas to assess processing speed, color difficulty, and interference.
- Compared standard interference measures with alternative relative, ratio, and residualized scores.
Main Results:
- The most significant differences between MS patients and controls were in processing speed.
- Standard interference measures produced contradictory results, failing to adequately control for processing speed.
- Alternative interference measures revealed age-related increases in interference but no significant group differences between MS patients and controls.
Conclusions:
- Cognitive difficulties in MS patients on the Stroop Test are primarily confined to processing speed deficits.
- Standard interference measures are unreliable for assessing cognitive interference in MS due to confounding processing speed effects.
- Alternative scoring methods provide more accurate assessments of interference in MS populations.

