Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Relative Risk

Relative Risk

Relative risk (RR) is a statistical measure commonly used in epidemiology to compare the likelihood of a particular event occurring between two groups. This metric is important for evaluating the relationship between exposure to a specific risk factor and the probability of a particular outcome. It plays a crucial role in medical research, public health studies, and risk assessment. Relative risk quantifies how much more (or less) likely an event is to occur in an exposed group compared to an...

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:

Odds Ratio

Odds Ratio

The odds ratio (OR) is a statistical measure used extensively in epidemiology and research to quantify the strength of association between exposure and outcome across different groups. Unlike relative risk, which compares the probabilities of an event occurring, the odds ratio compares the odds of an event occurring in the exposed group to the odds of it occurring in the unexposed group. The odds, in this context, are calculated as the probability of the event happening divided by the...

Sample Proportion and Population Proportion

Sample Proportion and Population Proportion

Collecting samples or responses from an entire population takes significant time and effort, so a researcher collects responses from only a sample of that population. Suppose a study needs to collect information about a specific mobile application. After sample collection, the researcher analyzes the data and discovers that most individuals in the sample use that specific mobile application. The sample proportion measures the number of individuals in a sample who either use or don't use the...

Distributions to Estimate Population Parameter

Distributions to Estimate Population Parameter

The accurate values of population parameters such as population proportion, population mean, and population standard deviation (or variance) are usually unknown. These are fixed values that can only be estimated from the data collected from the samples. The estimates of each of these parameters are sample proportion, the sample mean, and sample standard deviation (or variance). To obtain the values of these sample statistics, data are required that have particular distribution and central...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Estimating the rate of overdiagnosis with prostate cancer screening: evidence from the Finnish component of the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer.

Cancer causes & control : CCC·2021

Same author

Relative efficiencies of alternative preference-based designs for randomised trials.

Statistical methods in medical research·2020

Same author

A systematic survey of randomised trials that stopped early for reasons of futility.

BMC medical research methodology·2020

Same author

Corrigendum to "Studies reporting ROC curves of diagnostic and prediction data were incorporated into meta-analyses using corresponding odds ratios" [J Clin Epidemiol. 2007 May;60(5):530-4].

Journal of clinical epidemiology·2019

Same author

Randomised trials with provision for early stopping for benefit (or harm): The impact on the estimated treatment effect.

Statistics in medicine·2019

Same author

Letter to the Editor: Preference option randomized design (PORD) for comparative effectiveness research: Statistical power for testing comparative effect, preference effect, selection effect, intent-to-treat effect, and overall effect (SMMR, Vol. 28, Issue 2, 2019).

Statistical methods in medical research·2018

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 23, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

Local estimates of population attributable risk.

¹Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, HSC-2C16, Hamilton, Ontario L8N 3Z5, Canada. walter@mcmaster.ca

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

|May 1, 2009

Summary

Estimating population attributable risk (PAR) locally is improved by combining data sources. Incorporating external data enhances precision, especially when local exposure prevalence varies.

Area of Science:

Epidemiology
Biostatistics
Public Health

Background:

Population Attributable Risk (PAR) estimates are crucial for public health interventions.
Calculating PAR often involves combining data from various sources, such as local studies or applying national findings to specific regions.
Challenges arise when PAR components originate from different datasets, impacting estimate precision.

Purpose of the Study:

To develop a framework for estimating local PAR values.
To investigate the properties of PAR estimates when components are sourced independently.
To assess methods for improving the precision of PAR estimates in localized populations.

Main Methods:

A novel framework for estimating local PAR was developed.
The framework was validated using both synthetic datasets and empirical data from an international case-control study.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 23, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

A general expression for the variance of local PAR estimates was formulated, considering relative risk and exposure prevalence.

Main Results:

The variance of local PAR estimates depends on the relative risk variance, exposure prevalence variance, and their covariance.
Synthetic scenarios demonstrated the impact of varying stratum sizes, case-control ratios, and exposure prevalence.
Analysis of heart disease data illustrated the practical application and variability of local PAR estimates.

Conclusions:

Local PAR estimates benefit significantly from the integration of external data sources.
Relying solely on local data can limit the precision of PAR estimates.
Uncertainty in local exposure prevalence is a key driver of variation in PAR estimates.