Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 23, 2026

A Contusive Model of Unilateral Cervical Spinal Cord Injury Using the Infinite Horizon Impactor
Published on: July 24, 2012
Modelling contralesional movement slowing after unilateral brain damage
Casimir J H Ludwig1, Stephen H Butler, Stephanie Rossit
1University of Bristol, Bristol, UK. c.ludwig@bristol.ac.uk
Brain damage slows motor responses. For patients with right hemisphere damage, this slowing is due to needing more evidence for a response, not slower evidence processing. This impacts contralesional space interaction.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Cognitive Psychology
- Motor Control
Background:
- Effective interaction with the environment necessitates rapid processing of relevant stimuli and organized motor responses.
- Unilateral brain lesions often impair motor behavior, particularly in the visual field opposite the lesion (contralesional space).
- Accumulator models offer frameworks to differentiate between slowed evidence accumulation and increased evidence thresholds as causes of motor deficits.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the functional cause of motor response slowing in patients with unilateral right hemisphere damage.
- To determine whether slowed evidence extraction or an increased evidence threshold underlies contralesional motor deficits.
Main Methods:
- Three patients with unilateral right hemisphere lesions participated.
- A visually guided saccade task was employed to measure response latencies.
- Saccade latency distributions were analyzed using competing accumulator models.
Main Results:
- All patients exhibited significantly increased response latencies for targets in the contralesional visual field.
- Model fitting indicated that the observed latency differences were best explained by an elevated evidence threshold.
- The data did not support slowed evidence extraction as the primary cause.
Conclusions:
- Right hemisphere damage leads to motor response deficits in contralesional space primarily through an increased requirement for response evidence.
- This finding has implications for understanding sensorimotor integration and the neural basis of response selection.
More Related Videos
09:42Motor Imagery Brain-Computer Interface in Rehabilitation of Upper Limb Motor Dysfunction After Stroke
Published on: September 1, 2023
08:27Development of an Uncomplicated Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Model Modified by Weight-Drop Method and Evidenced by Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Published on: April 11, 2025