Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 23, 2026

Percutaneous Hepatic Perfusion (PHP) with Melphalan as a Treatment for Unresectable Metastases Confined to the Liver
Published on: July 31, 2016
Phase II study of sorafenib in patients with metastatic or recurrent sarcomas
Robert G Maki1, David R D'Adamo, Mary L Keohan
1Melanoma-Sarcoma Program, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, Howard 909, New York, NY 10065, USA. makir@mskcc.org
Abstract:
PURPOSE Since activity of sorafenib was observed in sarcoma patients in a phase I study, we performed a multicenter phase II study of daily oral sorafenib in patients with recurrent or metastatic sarcoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS We employed a multiarm study design, each representing a sarcoma subtype with its own Simon optimal two-stage design. In each arm, 12 patients who received 0 to 1 prior lines of therapy were treated (0 to 3 for angiosarcoma and malignant peripheral-nerve sheath tumor). If at least one Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) was observed, 25 further patients with that sarcoma subtype were accrued. Results Between October 2005 and November 2007, 145 patients were treated; 144 were eligible for toxicity and 122 for response. Median age was 55 years; female-male ratio was 1.8:1. The median number of cycles was 3. Five of 37 patients with angiosarcoma had a partial response (response rate, 14%). This was the only arm to meet the RECIST response rate primary end point. Median progression-free survival was 3.2 months; median overall survival was 14.3 months. Adverse events (typically dermatological) necessitated dose reduction for 61% of patients. Statistical modeling in this limited patient cohort indicated sorafenib toxicity was correlated inversely to patient height. There was no correlation between phosphorylated extracellular signal regulated kinase expression and response in six patients with angiosarcoma with paired pre- and post-therapy biopsies. CONCLUSION As a single agent, sorafenib has activity against angiosarcoma and minimal activity against other sarcomas. Further evaluation of sorafenib in these and possibly other sarcoma subtypes appears warranted, presumably in combination with cytotoxic or kinase-specific agents.
Insights
Sorafenib showed activity in angiosarcoma patients but minimal activity in other sarcoma types. Further research into sorafenib for sarcoma, possibly combined with other agents, is recommended.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Pharmacology
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- Sorafenib demonstrated preliminary activity in sarcoma patients during a Phase I study.
- Recurrent or metastatic sarcoma presents significant treatment challenges.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy and safety of daily oral sorafenib in patients with recurrent or metastatic sarcoma.
- To assess sorafenib's activity across different sarcoma subtypes.
Main Methods:
- A multicenter, multiarm Phase II study using a Simon optimal two-stage design for various sarcoma subtypes.
- Patients received daily oral sorafenib; accrual for subtypes depended on initial response.
- Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) was used to assess efficacy.
Main Results:
- 145 patients were treated; 122 were eligible for response assessment.
- Angiosarcoma was the only subtype to meet the primary endpoint, with a 14% partial response rate (5/37 patients).
- Median progression-free survival was 3.2 months, and median overall survival was 14.3 months. Dermatological adverse events were common, necessitating dose reduction in 61% of patients.
Conclusions:
- Sorafenib exhibits single-agent activity primarily in angiosarcoma.
- Minimal activity was observed in other sarcoma subtypes.
- Further investigation of sorafenib, potentially in combination therapies, is warranted for angiosarcoma and other sarcoma subtypes.
Related Concept Videos
Treatment Resistent Cancers
Treatment Resistant Cancers
