Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Determination of Multiple Dosing Parameters: Loading and Maintenance Doses01:25

Determination of Multiple Dosing Parameters: Loading and Maintenance Doses

A loading dose is an essential pharmacological strategy to rapidly achieve the target plasma drug concentration necessary for an immediate therapeutic effect. This approach is especially critical for drugs characterized by slow absorption or extended half-lives, where delaying therapeutic plasma levels could compromise treatment outcomes. By administering a loading dose, clinicians ensure a prompt onset of drug action, even for agents with complex pharmacokinetic profiles.Achieving steady-state...
Dose Size and Dosing Frequency: Determination Methods01:21

Dose Size and Dosing Frequency: Determination Methods

Determining the optimal dose size and dosing frequency in pharmacotherapy is crucial for achieving therapeutic effectiveness while minimizing adverse effects. This article explores the methodologies employed in determining these parameters, focusing on their significance and interplay to tailor dosing regimens.Dose Size: Dose size refers to the amount of a drug administered in a single dose. It is determined based on the drug's pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics properties and...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Deep learning and radiomics models in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with immunotherapy combined with stereotactic radiotherapy.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Certification of radiation protection professionals in Australia and New Zealand.

Annals of the ICRP·2026
Same author

Training and assessing convolutional neural network performance in automatic vascular segmentation using Ga-68 DOTATATE PET/CT.

The international journal of cardiovascular imaging·2024
Same author

Immediate versus expedient emergent laparotomy in unstable isolated abdominal trauma patients.

Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England·2024
Same author

Function Preservation with Brachytherapy: Reviving the Art.

Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain))·2023
Same author

Challenges in the Sustainability of Brachytherapy Service in Contemporary Radiotherapy.

Clinical oncology (Royal College of Radiologists (Great Britain))·2023

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 23, 2026

Dosimetry for Cell Irradiation using Orthovoltage (40-300 kV) X-Ray Facilities
06:51

Dosimetry for Cell Irradiation using Orthovoltage (40-300 kV) X-Ray Facilities

Published on: February 20, 2021

Comprehensive Australasian multicentre dosimetric intercomparison: issues, logistics and recommendations.

M A Ebert1, K M Harrison, D Cornes

  • 1Department of Radiation Oncology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Hospital Avenue, Nedlands, WA 6009, Australia. martin.ebert@health.wa.gov.au

Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology
|May 21, 2009
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study details the logistics of the Australasian Level III Dosimetry Intercomparison (2004-2008). It provides insights into the planning, execution, and resource needs for conducting radiotherapy dosimetry audits.

More Related Videos

Irradiator Commissioning and Dosimetry for Assessment of LQ α and β Parameters, Radiation Dosing Schema, and in vivo Dose Deposition
06:20

Irradiator Commissioning and Dosimetry for Assessment of LQ α and β Parameters, Radiation Dosing Schema, and in vivo Dose Deposition

Published on: March 11, 2021

Radiation Planning Assistant - A Streamlined, Fully Automated Radiotherapy Treatment Planning System
08:25

Radiation Planning Assistant - A Streamlined, Fully Automated Radiotherapy Treatment Planning System

Published on: April 11, 2018

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 23, 2026

Dosimetry for Cell Irradiation using Orthovoltage (40-300 kV) X-Ray Facilities
06:51

Dosimetry for Cell Irradiation using Orthovoltage (40-300 kV) X-Ray Facilities

Published on: February 20, 2021

Irradiator Commissioning and Dosimetry for Assessment of LQ α and β Parameters, Radiation Dosing Schema, and in vivo Dose Deposition
06:20

Irradiator Commissioning and Dosimetry for Assessment of LQ α and β Parameters, Radiation Dosing Schema, and in vivo Dose Deposition

Published on: March 11, 2021

Radiation Planning Assistant - A Streamlined, Fully Automated Radiotherapy Treatment Planning System
08:25

Radiation Planning Assistant - A Streamlined, Fully Automated Radiotherapy Treatment Planning System

Published on: April 11, 2018

Area of Science:

  • Medical Physics
  • Radiotherapy Quality Assurance
  • Radiation Dosimetry

Background:

  • Dosimetric intercomparisons are crucial for verifying radiotherapy accuracy and quality.
  • Level III intercomparisons assess the entire radiotherapy treatment process.
  • Previous intercomparisons have not comprehensively evaluated the logistical aspects of such large-scale audits.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the feasibility and logistics of conducting ongoing Level III dosimetry intercomparisons in Australasia.
  • To document the processes, resource requirements, and challenges associated with establishing and executing a multi-centre dosimetry audit.
  • To provide recommendations for future phantom-based intercomparisons.

Main Methods:

  • Established a study team and protocol in 2002.
  • Recruited 40 independent radiotherapy centres in Australia and New Zealand.
  • Conducted measurement visits to 37 centres between October 2004 and March 2008, collecting data on time, costs, and logistics.

Main Results:

  • The study involved 16 staff members dedicating over 4000 hours.
  • Over 200 professionals from participating centres were involved.
  • Detailed data on study costs and required support levels were collated.

Conclusions:

  • The 2004-2008 Australasian Level III Dosimetry Intercomparison successfully evaluated the logistics of comprehensive radiotherapy audits.
  • The findings offer valuable guidance on potential hazards, pitfalls, and resource needs for similar future initiatives.
  • Recommendations are provided to assist centres planning phantom-based intercomparisons.