Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 23, 2026

Quantified Assessment of Infant's Gross Motor Abilities Using a Multisensor Wearable
Published on: May 17, 2024
Calculating postnatal growth velocity in very low birth weight (VLBW) premature infants
A L Patel1, J L Engstrom, P P Meier
1Pediatrics, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL 60612, USA. aloka_patel@rush.edu
Insights
The exponential model (EM) accurately estimates growth velocity (GV) in hospitalized very low birth weight (VLBW) infants, outperforming the 2-Point model (2-PM). This validated EM offers a consistent approach for assessing VLBW infant growth.
Area of Science:
- Neonatalogy
- Pediatric Nutrition
- Growth Monitoring
Background:
- Standardized growth velocity (GV) calculation is lacking for hospitalized very low birth weight (VLBW) infants.
- Disparate GV estimation methods hinder comparability across Neonatal Intensive Care Units (NICUs) and studies.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare actual GV calculated from daily weights with estimated GV using the exponential model (EM) and 2-Point model (2-PM).
- To validate mathematical models for accurate GV assessment in VLBW infants.
Main Methods:
- Actual GV calculated from daily weights of 81 VLBW infants (1000-1499g BW) from birth and regain of birth weight (BW).
- Comparison of actual GV with estimated GV from EM and 2-PM.
Main Results:
- The EM demonstrated <1% mean absolute difference from actual GV for all infants.
- The 2-PM showed <1% error for only 38% (from birth) and 44% (from regain BW) of infants.
- EM accuracy was unaffected by decreasing BW and increasing NICU stay, unlike the 2-PM.
Conclusions:
- The EM provides highly accurate GV estimates in VLBW infants, unaffected by common clinical factors.
- The EM is validated for consistent and simple GV assessment in all VLBW infants.
- The EM offers a standardized approach to growth monitoring in NICU populations.
Objective:
Currently, there is no standardized approach to the calculation of growth velocity (GV; g kg (-1) day(-1)) in hospitalized very low birth weight (VLBW) infants. Thus, differing methods are used to estimate GV, resulting in different medical centers and studies reporting growth results that are difficult to compare. The objective of this study was to compare actual GV calculated from infant daily weights during hospitalization in a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) with estimated GV using two mathematical models that have been shown earlier to provide good estimated GVs in extremely low birth weight (ELBW) infants: an exponential model (EM) and a 2-Point model (2-PM).
Study Design:
Daily weights from 81 infants with birth weights (BWs) of 1000 to 1499 g were used to calculate actual GV in daily increments from two starting points: (1) birth and (2) day of life (DOL) of regaining BW. These daily GV values were then averaged over the NICU stay to yield overall NICU GV from the two starting points. We compared these actual GV with estimated GV calculated using the EM and 2-PM methods.
Results:
The mean absolute difference between actual and EM estimates of GV showed <1% error for 100% of infants from both starting points. The mean absolute difference between actual and 2-PM estimates showed <1% error for only 38 and 44% of infants from birth and regaining BW, respectively. The EM was unaffected by decreasing BW and increasing length of NICU stay, whereas the accuracy of the 2-PM was diminished significantly (P<0.001) by both factors.
Conclusion:
In contrast to the 2-PM, the EM provides an extremely accurate estimate of GV in larger VLBW infants, and its accuracy is unaffected by common infant factors. The EM has now been validated for use in all VLBW infants to assess growth and provides a simple-to-use and consistent approach.
Related Concept Videos
Instantaneous Velocity - II
Velocity and Position by Graphical Method
Average and Instantaneous Velocity Vectors
Oxygen Requirements and Growth Patterns
Relative Motion Analysis - Velocity
When an external force is exerted, it sets the crank into a rotational movement. This, in turn, instigates the motion of the connecting rod, leading to what is referred to as a general plane motion. This process involves two key points - point A on the connecting rod...

