Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Orienting, habituation, and resource allocation: an associative analysis.

D A Siddle1

  • 1University of Tasmania.

Psychophysiology
|May 1, 1991
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The effects of change in lead stimulus modality on the modulation of acoustic blink startle.

Psychophysiology·2000
Same author

The effect of warning stimulus modality on blink startle modification in reaction time tasks.

Psychophysiology·2000
Same author

The effects of threat and nonthreat word lead stimuli on blink modification.

Psychophysiology·1999
Same author

Effects of stimulus modality and task condition on blink startle modification and on electrodermal responses.

Psychophysiology·1998
Same author

The effects of prepulse-blink reflex trial repetition and prepulse change on blink reflex modification at short and long lead intervals.

Biological psychology·1998
Same author

Conditioned inhibition of autonomic Pavlovian conditioning in humans.

Biological psychology·1997

This study suggests that human habituation and orienting responses are best explained by a comparator theory. This theory emphasizes comparing predicted and actual stimuli and involves reallocating attentional resources.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Psychophysiology

Background:

  • Orienting and habituation are fundamental processes in how organisms respond to stimuli.
  • Existing theories struggle to fully account for complex habituation phenomena.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To determine the most appropriate theoretical framework for explaining orienting and habituation.
  • To evaluate the roles of comparator and associative processes in these phenomena.

Main Methods:

  • Review of evidence from stimulus omission, paired stimulus events, and secondary task probe reaction times.
  • Analysis of electrodermal responses to intermodality changes and context-specific habituation.

Main Results:

  • Stimulus omission data support comparator theory.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Secondary task data show orienting commands processing resources, and habituation alters processing.
  • Intermodality change data challenge non-comparator theories, while context effects question purely associative accounts.

    • Conclusions:

    • An adequate theory of human habituation must incorporate a comparison process.
    • Orienting and habituation involve dynamic re-allocation of attentional resources.