Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 22, 2026

Methods to Quantify Pharmacologically Induced Alterations in Motor Function in Human Incomplete SCI
Published on: April 18, 2011
Spasticity, an impairment that is poorly defined and poorly measured
S Malhotra1, A D Pandyan, C R Day
1School of Health & Rehabilitation and Research Institute for Life Course Studies, University of Keele, UK.
Spasticity lacks a consistent definition and unified assessment framework across studies. Inconsistent definitions and measurement methods compromise research validity, necessitating clearer congruence in future spasticity research.
Area of Science:
- Neurology
- Rehabilitation Medicine
- Biomedical Research
Background:
- Spasticity is a common motor disorder following neurological injury, characterized by velocity-dependent muscle tone increase.
- Existing literature reveals a lack of consensus regarding the definition and assessment of spasticity.
- This ambiguity impacts the reliability and comparability of research findings in the field.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically review the literature and identify a consistent definition of spasticity.
- To determine if a unified assessment framework for spasticity exists.
- To explore the congruence between spasticity definitions and measurement methods.
Main Methods:
- A systematic literature search was conducted across major electronic databases (Web of Science, Science Direct, MEDLINE).
- Publications in English from 1980 to 2006 were reviewed using keywords: spasticity, tone, stroke, hemiplegia, upper, hand, and arm.
- A total of 250 references, including clinical trials, literature reviews, and case reports, were analyzed.
Main Results:
- The term 'spasticity' was inconsistently defined, with 78 studies using the Lance definition, 88 equating it with increased muscle tone, and 78 providing no definition.
- Measurement methods often lacked congruence with the defined clinical features of spasticity, compromising internal validity.
- A variety of assessment methods were employed, including neurophysiological, biomechanical, and clinical measures, with limited explicit description in some studies.
Conclusions:
- The definition and assessment of spasticity are inconsistent across the scientific literature.
- There is a critical need to resolve definitional ambiguities and establish a unified framework for spasticity assessment.
- Future research must ensure congruence between spasticity definitions and measurement techniques to improve study validity and clinical relevance.
Related Concept Videos
Alterations in Muscle Tone ll
Alterations in Muscle Tone lll
Spasmolytic Agents: Chemical Classification
A major class of centrally acting spasmolytics is the α2-agonist, such as tizanidine. These drugs bind to α2-adrenoceptors, inhibiting the release of the excitatory neurotransmitter glutamate. They also promote...
Spinal Cord Injury ll: Pathophysiology
Tetanus
Secondary Spinal Cord Injury llI: Pathophysiology
