[Computerized tomography: problems and errors in the diagnosis of renal masses]

The diagnostic imaging of renal masses has greatly benefitted from US and CT. Nevertheless, a certain number of problems and errors are still present, and they must be discussed once more. In the authors' experience, problems and errors have 3 fundamental causes: operator, examination technique and complex patterns of renal masses. The latter is the most important cause of error in CT diagnosis. Complex patterns are seen in a limited number of cystic masses--i.e., hemorrhagic, inflammatory, and septated cysts, and cystic tumors. Hemorrhagic cysts, if hemorrhage is not recent, can cause some diagnostic difficulties since the typical high density of the recent hemorrhage is no longer present. Other renal masses may appear hyperdense on unenhanced CT scans, and therefore they must be considered in the differential diagnosis. Inflammatory cysts and abscesses are sometimes difficult to differentiate from other masses due to their aspecific appearance; clinical correlation is important in these instances to support CT diagnosis. Multiseptated cysts and cystic tumors cause huge problems of differential diagnosis. A good knowledge of differential CT findings is sure to reduce the problems in differentiating benign from malignant tumors and, among the latter, the different histotypes and metastases, when present as solitary masses. Also in this case, the correlation between CT, clinical history and other modalities can reduce the number of questionable cases.