Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 22, 2026

Low-Cost Single-Port (LoCoSP) Device for a Transcervical Approach in Minimally Invasive Transhiatal Esophagectomy
Published on: September 11, 2021
Feasibility of transgastric and transcolonic natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery peritoneoscopy combined
Rogier P Voermans1, Mark I van Berge Henegouwen, Willem A Bemelman
1Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Background:
If natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) peritoneoscopy is to become an alternative to diagnostic laparoscopy, NOTES peritoneoscopy must be comparable to laparoscopy in its diagnostic accuracy.
Objective:
To assess the feasibility of transgastric (TG) and transcolonic (TC) NOTES peritoneoscopy combined with intraperitoneal EUS.
Design:
Twelve nonsurvival experiments on 6 female pigs.
Setting:
Animal laboratory.
Patients:
Six 35- to 40-kg female pigs.
Interventions:
Randomization was performed to determine the order of approach (TG or TC as first procedure). After peritoneal access, systematic peritoneoscopy was performed according to a preassessed list of 12 locations considered clinically important. For each visualized location, 1 point was scored and 1 point added if it was touched as well, leading to a maximum score of 24 points. Subsequently, the endoscope was exchanged for a linear EUS-scope. The percentage of visualization of the 4 sections of the liver was recorded (0, not visible; 1, 33%; 2, 66%; 3, 100%; maximum score, 12 points). After withdrawal, the protocol was repeated by using the second natural orifice (TG or TC).
Main Outcome Measurements:
Extent of adequate visualization of diagnostic peritoneoscopy and intraperitoneal EUS measured by a preassessed record form.
Results:
Access was achieved without difficulties at all 12 sites. TG peritoneoscopy resulted in a median of 23 points (range 20-24) via the TC approach. A maximum of 24 points was recorded in all pigs (P = .102). TG-EUS resulted in a median of 11 points (range 6-12) and TC-EUS in a median of 12 points (range 8-12) (P = .317).
Limitation:
Lack of objective landmarks for EUS.
Conclusions:
TG and TC NOTES peritoneoscopy combined with intraperitoneal EUS is technically feasible. Furthermore, NOTES peritoneoscopy and intraperitoneal EUS seem to result in adequate visualization of the peritoneal cavity and liver, respectively.
