Related Experiment Videos
Maternal perception of decreased fetal movement as an indication for antepartum testing in a low-risk population
J E Whitty1, D A Garfinkel, M Y Divon
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weiler Hospital, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Yeshiva University, Bronx, NY 10461.
Maternal perception of decreased fetal movement has traditionally been used as an indication for fetal testing in high-risk patients. Two hundred ninety-two low-risk patients who presented with a complaint of decreased fetal movement were studied to determine the incidence of adverse outcome and need for further testing. Initial testing included a nonstress test and ultrasonographic examination. Five (1.7%) of the study group had fetal death on initial examination and 4.4% of patients required immediate delivery because of abnormal maternal or fetal evaluation. An additional 5.8% had abnormal fetal heart rate tracings that necessitated follow-up. Fifty-two percent of patients with normal initial evaluations underwent additional testing. There were no significant differences between patients undergoing additional testing, patients having no additional testing, and a low-risk nontested group with regard to adverse outcome. Fetal surveillance is indicated in low-risk patients with decreased fetal movement. Additional testing of patients with a normal initial evaluation and no further complaint of decreased fetal movement may not be necessary.
Maternal perception of decreased fetal movement has traditionally been used as an indication for fetal testing in high-risk patients. Two hundred ninety-two low-risk patients who presented with a complaint of decreased fetal movement were studied to determine the incidence of adverse outcome and need for further testing. Initial testing included a nonstress test and ultrasonographic examination. Five (1.7%) of the study group had fetal death on initial examination and 4.4% of patients required immediate delivery because of abnormal maternal or fetal evaluation. An additional 5.8% had abnormal fetal heart rate tracings that necessitated follow-up. Fifty-two percent of patients with normal initial evaluations underwent additional testing. There were no significant differences between patients undergoing additional testing, patients having no additional testing, and a low-risk nontested group with regard to adverse outcome. Fetal surveillance is indicated in low-risk patients with decreased fetal movement. Additional testing of patients with a normal initial evaluation and no further complaint of decreased fetal movement may not be necessary.