Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Comparative effectiveness research in evidence-based dental practice.

Francesco Chiappelli1, Olivia S Cajulis, Michael G Newman

  • 1UCLA School of Dentistry, Division of Oral Biology & Medicine, and Associate Clinical Specialties, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA. fchiappelli@dentistry.ucla.edu

The Journal of Evidence-Based Dental Practice
|June 17, 2009
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

Methods of Documentation V: CBE01:23

Methods of Documentation V: CBE

Charting by Exception, or CBE, is a method of documentation used in healthcare, particularly in nursing, that focuses on documenting only significant or abnormal findings rather than recording every detail. This approach aims to streamline the documentation process, improve efficiency, and ensure that healthcare providers can quickly identify deviations from normalcy in patient assessments.
In CBE, healthcare professionals establish predefined standards of practice that define what constitutes...
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs01:15

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs

Bioequivalence experimental study designs play a pivotal role in testing the effectiveness of various treatments. Key among these are the repeated measures, cross-over, carry-over, and Latin square designs. In the repeated measures design, each subject receives all treatments, allowing for temporal comparisons. This type of design is useful in reducing variability but requires careful planning to avoid bias.The cross-over design, an economical method, involves sequential administration of...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The Artificial Intelligence (AI) paradox.

Bioinformation·2026
Same author

Precision dentistry: Enhancing clinical treatment by combining individual data-driven insights with clinical experience.

Journal of the American Dental Association (1939)·2026
Same author

Risk of Type II Diabetes Mellitus Among B-Cell Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Survivors.

Cancer medicine·2026
Same author

Authors' Response.

Journal of the American Dental Association (1939)·2025
Same author

Risk group-4 virus emergent threats.

Bioinformation·2025
Same author

Regulation of inflammaging.

Bioinformation·2025
Same journal

POTENTIAL RESEARCH WASTE DUE TO PRIMARY STUDIES OVERLAP IN ORTHODONTICS SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS: A FIVE-YEAR ANALYSIS.

The journal of evidence-based dental practice·2026
Same journal

AUTOGENOUS SOFT TISSUE GRAFT MAY IMPROVE PERI‑IMPLANT TISSUE CONDITIONS.

The journal of evidence-based dental practice·2026
Same journal

EVIDENCE-BASED ANALYSIS OF ADVANCED CLINICAL MANAGEMENT IN ORAL SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA.

The journal of evidence-based dental practice·2026
Same journal

PERSISTENT ORAL INFECTIONS MAY INCREASE THE RISK OF INFECTIOUS COMPLICATIONS IN ORGAN TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS.

The journal of evidence-based dental practice·2026
Same journal

ALVEOLAR RIDGE PRESERVATION AT MOLAR EXTRACTION SITES MAY LESSEN RIDGE CHANGES AND AUGMENTATION NEEDS.

The journal of evidence-based dental practice·2026
Same journal

THE EFFICACY OF TECHNIQUES FOR MANAGING FRACTURED DENTAL IMPLANT ABUTMENT SCREWS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS.

The journal of evidence-based dental practice·2026
See all related articles

Evidence-based dental practice (EBDP) may significantly benefit from comparative effectiveness research (CER). While intertwined, the exact relationship and potential advantages require careful consideration of their similarities and differences.

Area of Science:

  • Dental Science
  • Health Services Research

Background:

  • Evidence-based dental practice (EBDP) integrates research evidence into clinical decision-making.
  • Comparative effectiveness research (CER) evaluates the benefits and harms of treatments for real-world patient populations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore the potential benefits of comparative effectiveness research (CER) for advancing evidence-based dental practice (EBDP).
  • To clarify the relationship between CER and EBDP, examining their synergies and distinctions.

Main Methods:

  • Conceptual analysis of the principles and methodologies of both EBDP and CER.
  • Review of existing literature on the integration of research findings into dental practice.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • CER and EBDP share a common goal of improving patient outcomes through research.
  • Potential for CER to provide crucial data for EBDP, informing clinical guidelines and treatment choices.
  • Ambiguity exists regarding the precise overlap and unique contributions of each approach.

    • Conclusions:

    • CER holds significant promise for enhancing EBDP by providing robust comparative data.
    • Further clarification of the interplay between CER and EBDP is needed to maximize mutual benefits.
    • A cautious yet optimistic outlook is warranted regarding the integration of CER into dental practice.