Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 22, 2026

Integrating Computerized Linguistic and Social Network Analyses to Capture Addiction Recovery Capital in an Online Community
Published on: May 31, 2019
The utility of online panel surveys versus computer-assisted interviews in obtaining substance-use prevalence
Renske Spijkerman1, Ronald Knibbe, Kim Knoops
1Radboud University, Behavioural Science Institute, Nijmegen, the Netherlands. r.spijkerman@pwo.ru.nl
Aims:
Rather than using the traditional, costly method of personal interviews in a general population sample, substance-use prevalence rates can be derived more conveniently from data collected among members of an online access panel. To examine the utility of this method, we compared the outcomes of an online survey with those obtained with the computer-assisted personal interviews (CAPI) method.
Design:
Data were gathered from a large sample of online panellists and in a two-stage stratified sample of the Dutch population using the CAPI method.
Setting:
The Netherlands. Participants The online sample comprised 57 125 Dutch online panellists (15-64 years) of Survey Sampling International LLC (SSI), and the CAPI cohort 7204 respondents (15-64 years).
Measurements:
All participants answered identical questions about their use of alcohol, cannabis, ecstasy, cocaine and performance-enhancing drugs. The CAPI respondents were asked additionally about internet access and online panel membership. Both data sets were weighted statistically according to the distribution of demographic characteristics of the general Dutch population.
Findings:
Response rates were 35.5% (n = 20 282) for the online panel cohort and 62.7% (n = 4516) for the CAPI cohort. The data showed almost consistently lower substance-use prevalence rates for the CAPI respondents. Although the observed differences could be due to bias in both data sets, coverage and non-response bias were higher in the online panel survey.
Conclusions:
Despite its economic advantage, the online panel survey showed stronger non-response and coverage bias than the CAPI survey, leading to less reliable estimates of substance use in the general population.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Surveys
Convenience Sampling Method
Convenience sampling is a non-random method of sample selection; this method selects individuals that are easily accessible and may result in biased data. For example, a marketing...
Data Collection by Survey
Analysis of Population Pharmacokinetic Data
Longitudinal Research
Data Collection by Observations
An astronomer viewing the motion and brightness of stars in the sky and recording the data is an example of observational data collection. A botanist recording...

