Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 22, 2026
04:19
The Establishment of a Murine Mandibular Molar Extraction Socket Healing Model
Published on: January 13, 2023
Immediate implants at fresh extraction sockets: bone healing in four different implant systems
Massimo de Sanctis1, Fabio Vignoletti, Nicola Discepoli
1Dipartimento di Scienze, Universitá degli stidi di Siena, Odontostomatologiche, Siena, Italy.
Journal of Clinical Periodontology
|June 25, 2009
Summary
This study found no significant differences in bone healing among four dental implant systems placed in extraction sockets after six weeks. However, buccal bone resorption was observed, potentially limiting this surgical approach.
Area of Science:
- Dental Implantology
- Oral Surgery
- Bone Regeneration
Background:
- Immediate implant placement in extraction sockets is a common surgical approach.
- Understanding the influence of different implant systems on bone healing is crucial for predictable outcomes.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare bone healing and ridge alterations associated with four distinct dental implant systems.
- To evaluate bone-to-implant contact (BIC), bone area, and new bone formation.
Main Methods:
- Four different implant systems were evaluated in beagle dogs.
- Implants were placed in fresh extraction sockets (P3 and P4 teeth).
- Histo-morphometric analysis was performed at 6 weeks post-placement.
Main Results:
- No statistically significant differences in bone healing were found among the four implant systems.
- Mean bone-to-implant contact (BIC) ranged from 58.5% to 72.1%.
- Significant buccal bone modeling (approximately 2.5 mm) occurred, irrespective of the implant system.
Conclusions:
- The study did not reveal differences in healing patterns between the four implant systems after six weeks.
- While predictable osseointegration was achieved, buccal bone resorption poses a potential limitation for this technique.
