Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 30, 2026
10:07
Using Learning Outcome Measures to assess Doctoral Nursing Education
Published on: June 22, 2010
Differentiating impact evaluation from evaluation research: one perspective of implications for continuing nursing
Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing
|November 1, 1991
Summary
Continuing nursing education practitioners must differentiate impact evaluation from evaluation research to avoid flawed conclusions. Understanding their distinct characteristics ensures accurate interpretation of study findings for better decision-making.
Area of Science:
- Nursing Education
- Program Evaluation
- Research Methodology
Background:
- Continuing nursing education (CNE) requires practitioners to critically analyze literature.
- Misinterpreting evaluation types can lead to incorrect conclusions and poor decision-making.
- Distinguishing between impact evaluation and evaluation research is crucial for CNE professionals.
Purpose of the Study:
- To define and differentiate impact evaluation and evaluation research.
- To compare these two evaluation approaches across key dimensions.
- To outline the strengths and weaknesses of each evaluation type for CNE practitioners.
Main Methods:
- Literature review and conceptual analysis.
- Comparative analysis of impact evaluation and evaluation research.
- Identification of seven key distinguishing dimensions.
Main Results:
- Impact evaluation focuses on specific program effects.
- Evaluation research involves broader, systematic inquiry.
- Both methods have unique strengths and limitations impacting their application in CNE.
Conclusions:
- Clear distinction between impact evaluation and evaluation research is essential for CNE.
- Understanding these differences enhances the validity of evidence-based practice in nursing.
- Proper application of evaluation findings supports informed CNE program development and decision-making.
Related Concept Videos
01:08Role of Communication in the Nursing Process III: Evaluation and Documentation
A successful patient outcome depends mainly on the evaluation stage of the nursing process. Evaluation determines effectiveness by reviewing what was done previously after the completion of nursing interventions. Every time a healthcare professional steps in or administers treatment, they must reassess or evaluate the action to ensure the intended result. During the evaluation phase, there are three probable patient outcomes:
01:20Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation
Evaluation of the teaching process enables the nurse to determine if the patient's learning needs were met and if training was effective. If the expected outcomes are not met, the care plan is revised, and additional education or reinforcement is provided. Nurses can ask questions after the session or obtain feedback to assess the patient's understanding of the topic.
Nurses can use several methods to evaluate patient outcomes. For example, oral questions can assess cognitive learning, patient...
Nurses can use several methods to evaluate patient outcomes. For example, oral questions can assess cognitive learning, patient...
01:13Patient-centered Care
Patient-centered care involves delivering care beyond inpatient hospitalization. Reflective practice can enhance a patient-centered approach. Reflective practice is a process of reasoning that considers all aspects of the present situation, including practicalities, learning from personal practice, and consideration of patient needs. Patients appreciate care decisions made while considering their input. Involving the patient in their care provides the patient with a sense of contribution rather...
01:24Critical Thinking I
Critical thinking helps decision-making and allows nurses to recognize barriers to success and find solutions to possible issues. It helps to brainstorm and implement ideas to achieve goals. Critical thinking helps acknowledge and state workflow inefficiencies while improving management techniques. Nurses understand the value of critical thinking and look for fellow nurses with critical thinking skills to upgrade their professional standards. Critical thinking can advance a nurse's career with...
01:25Critical Thinking II
Critical thinking is a cognitive process with several attributes. The attributes of critical thinking include the following:
01:15Nursing Evaluation
The evaluation stage signals the end of the nursing process. The nurse gathers evaluative data to assess whether or not the patient has attained the expected results. Whereas the nurse collects data in the nursing assessment to identify the patient's health concerns, the evaluation stage data determines if the indicated health issues are resolved. Evaluative data collection includes two sections: the data acquired to evaluate patient outcomes and the time criteria for data collection.
Section...
Section...