Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 21, 2026

Exploring the Neural Correlates of Cognitive Reappraisal in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Using Task-based Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Published on: March 14, 2025
Responding with restraint: what are the neurocognitive mechanisms?
Sara Jahfari1, Cathy M Stinear, Mike Claffey
1Department of Psychology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA92023, USA.
Abstract:
An important aspect of cognitive control is the ability to respond with restraint. Here, we modeled this experimentally by measuring the degree of response slowing that occurs when people respond to an imperative stimulus in a context where they might suddenly need to stop the initiated response compared with a context in which they do not need to stop. We refer to the RT slowing that occurs as the "response delay effect." We conjectured that this response delay effect could relate to one or more neurocognitive mechanism(s): partial response suppression (i.e., "active braking"), prolonged decision time, and slower response facilitation. These accounts make different predictions about motor system excitability and brain activation. To test which neurocognitive mechanisms underlie the response delay effect, we performed two studies with TMS and we reanalyzed fMRI data. The results suggest that the response delay effect is at least partly explained by active braking, possibly involving a mechanism that is similar to that used to stop responses completely. These results further our understanding of how people respond with restraint by pointing to proactive recruitment of a neurocognitive mechanism heretofore associated with outright stopping.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Self-Regulation
Neuroplasticity
The Influence of Cognition on Affect
Role of Cerebellum and Prefrontal Cortex in Memory
Reason and Intuition
Cognitive Theories: Lazarus Mediational Theory of Emotion
Cognitive Appraisal and Emotional Response
Lazarus proposed that emotions are not solely...

