Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 21, 2026

A New Technique for Treating Low-risk Prostate Cancer—Super Active Surveillance
Published on: November 7, 2025
The influence of prostate volume on prostate-specific antigen performance: implications for the prostate cancer
Christopher S Elliott1, Rajesh Shinghal, Joseph C Presti
1Department of Urology, 300 Pasteur Drive, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, California 94305, USA. chrsuz@aol.com
Purpose:
Although showing a 25% reduction in the biopsy prevalence of cancer compared with placebo in the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial, finasteride was associated with a higher prevalence of high-grade disease. This observation was driven by "for-cause" biopsies. We sought to understand how volume-dependent changes in prostate-specific antigen test performance characteristics may have contributed.
Experimental Design:
A retrospective review was done on 1,304 men referred for initial biopsy with a prostate-specific antigen between 4 and 10 ng/mL or an abnormal digital rectal examination. Receiver-operator curves and positive predictive values were ascertained for prostate-specific antigen stratified by diagnosis and prostate volume.
Results:
The performance of prostate-specific antigen changed for any and high-grade (Gleason, > or =3 + 4) cancer in a volume-specific manner. For any cancer, the area under the curve (AUC) decreased from 0.758 to 0.629 to 0.520 as prostate volume increased (<30, 30-50, >50 cm(3), respectively). For high-grade cancer, a similar trend was shown (AUC, 0.712, 0.639, and 0.497, respectively). The positive predictive value of a prostate-specific antigen of > or =4 ng/mL was also affected by prostate volume. Trends for Gleason < or = 6 decreased as prostate volume increased (positive predictive value for <30 cm(3), 25.0%; positive predictive value for 30-50 cm(3), 23.8%; and positive predictive value for >50 cm(3), 17.3%). A more significant trend was seen for high-grade cancer (positive predictive value for <30 cm(3), 39.0%; positive predictive value for 30-50 cm(3), 22.3%; and positive predictive value for >50 cm(3), 10.7%).
Conclusion:
Decreases in prostate volume over time and the resultant change in prostate-specific antigen performance characteristics may have contributed a bias toward the detection of high-grade disease in the finasteride arm of the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial.
Related Concept Videos
Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value
Sensitivity is the...
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Disorders of the Male Reproductive System
Prostate disorders are another major concern. These conditions can impair urinary flow due to the prostate's location around the urethra. Symptoms...
