Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

Systematic Error: Methodological and Sampling Errors

In the case of systematic errors, the sources can be identified, and the errors can be subsequently minimized by addressing these sources. According to the source, systematic errors can be divided into sampling, instrumental, methodological, and personal errors.
Sampling errors originate from improper sampling methods or the wrong sample population. These errors can be minimized by refining the sampling strategy. Defective instruments or faulty calibrations are the sources of instrumental...

Pharmaceutical Poisoning: Potential Scenarios

Pharmaceutical Poisoning: Potential Scenarios

Pharmaceutical poisoning can occur through various channels, impacting an estimated 2 million hospitalized patients in the U.S. annually with serious adverse drug responses. These scenarios encompass both therapeutic uses, such as drug toxicity, where even standard dosages can lead to severe central nervous system depression, and non-therapeutic exposures, including accidental ingestion by children, and environmental and occupational exposures.Unintentional poisonings often involve exploratory...

Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring

Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring

Blood pressure monitoring is a crucial clinical procedure in diagnosing and managing various cardiovascular conditions. Despite its significance, the accuracy of blood pressure measurements can be compromised by multiple factors, potentially leading to either falsely high or low readings. These inaccuracies are critical as they can significantly impact patient care. So, it is vital to understand these challenges deeply and adopt strategic approaches to minimize errors.
Several factors...

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:

Random and Systematic Errors

Random and Systematic Errors

Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...

Random and Systematic Errors

Random and Systematic Errors

Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Competing Benefits and Competing Hazards: The Benefit to Harm Balance in Individual Patients in Rational Therapeutics.

Drug safety·2024

Same author

Preventable deaths involving opioids in England and Wales, 2013-2022: a systematic case series of coroners' reports.

Journal of public health (Oxford, England)·2023

Same author

Effectiveness of biosimilar adoption within a UK tertiary hospital: 6-year follow-up.

British journal of clinical pharmacology·2023

Same author

Drug shortages. Part 1. Definitions and harms.

British journal of clinical pharmacology·2023

Same author

Drug shortages. Part 2: Trends, causes and solutions.

British journal of clinical pharmacology·2023

Same author

Recognition of Coroners' Concerns to Prevent Future Deaths from Medicines: A Systematic Review.

Pharmaceutical medicine·2023

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 21, 2026

Improving IV Insulin Administration in a Community Hospital

Improving IV Insulin Administration in a Community Hospital

Published on: June 11, 2012

The epidemiology of medication errors: the methodological difficulties.

Robin E Ferner¹

¹West Midlands Centre for Adverse Drug Reactions, City Hospital, Birmingham, UK. r.e.ferner@bham.ac.uk

British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology

|July 15, 2009

Summary

Epidemiological analysis of medication errors faces significant challenges due to unclear definitions and unreliable data collection methods. Improving these aspects is crucial for accurate error rate assessment and effective intervention strategies.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 21, 2026

Improving IV Insulin Administration in a Community Hospital

Improving IV Insulin Administration in a Community Hospital

Published on: June 11, 2012

Area of Science:

Pharmacovigilance
Epidemiology
Health Services Research

Background:

Medication errors are a significant concern in healthcare, necessitating epidemiological study to understand causes and intervention effectiveness.
Despite the importance of studying medication errors, substantial challenges hinder accurate analysis and rate determination.

Purpose of the Study:

To highlight the difficulties in establishing reliable rates of medication errors.
To identify key issues impeding epidemiological analysis of medication errors and their impact.

Main Methods:

Review of existing literature and methodologies for enumerating medication errors.
Analysis of definitional ambiguities and measurement inconsistencies in medication error research.

Main Results:

Lack of a clear, operational definition for medication errors complicates case identification.
Current methods for case enumeration are often unreliable or incomplete.
Disagreement exists on including errors without harm and attributing harm to errors.
The denominator used for calculating error rates is ill-defined and inconsistently measured.

Conclusions:

Epidemiological analysis of medication errors requires better definitions, more complete evaluations, and thorough impact assessments.
Addressing these methodological and definitional challenges is essential for accurate insights into medication errors and the development of effective prevention strategies.