Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Actuarial Approach01:20

Actuarial Approach

The actuarial approach, a statistical method originally developed for life insurance risk assessment, is widely used to calculate survival rates in clinical and population studies. This method accounts for participants lost to follow-up or those who die from causes unrelated to the study, ensuring a more accurate representation of survival probabilities.
Consider the example of a high-risk surgical procedure with significant early-stage mortality. A two-year clinical study is conducted,...
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and Cox...
Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data01:25

Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data

Epidemiological data primarily involves information on specific populations' occurrence, distribution, and determinants of health and diseases. This data is crucial for understanding disease patterns and impacts, aiding public health decision-making and disease prevention strategies. The analysis of epidemiological data employs various statistical methods to interpret health-related data effectively. Here are some commonly used methods:
Kaplan-Meier Approach01:24

Kaplan-Meier Approach

The Kaplan-Meier estimator is a non-parametric method used to estimate the survival function from time-to-event data. In medical research, it is frequently employed to measure the proportion of patients surviving for a certain period after treatment. This estimator is fundamental in analyzing time-to-event data, making it indispensable in clinical trials, epidemiological studies, and reliability engineering. By estimating survival probabilities, researchers can evaluate treatment effectiveness,...
Relative Risk01:12

Relative Risk

Relative risk (RR) is a statistical measure commonly used in epidemiology to compare the likelihood of a particular event occurring between two groups. This metric is important for evaluating the relationship between exposure to a specific risk factor and the probability of a particular outcome. It plays a crucial role in medical research, public health studies, and risk assessment. Relative risk quantifies how much more (or less) likely an event is to occur in an exposed group compared to an...
The Mantel-Cox Log-Rank Test01:19

The Mantel-Cox Log-Rank Test

The Mantel-Cox log-rank test is a widely used statistical method for comparing the survival distributions of two groups. It tests whether a statistically significant difference exists in survival times between the groups without assuming a specific distribution for the survival data, making it a non-parametric test. This flexibility makes the log-rank test particularly valuable in medical research and other fields where the timing of an event, such as death or disease recurrence, is of interest.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Pulmonary Hypertension, the Forgotten Right Ventricle, and Vascular Access in Hemodialysis Patients.

Clinical journal of the American Society of Nephrology : CJASN·2026
Same author

Adenovirus 40 and 41 Antibodies Associated With Protection From Infection in a Bangladeshi Birth Cohort.

The Journal of infectious diseases·2025
Same author

Race-neutral Pulmonary Function Testing in Risk Stratification of Patients Undergoing Autologous Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation.

Annals of the American Thoracic Society·2025
Same author

Host-microbiome determinants of ready-to-use supplemental food efficacy in acute childhood malnutrition.

JCI insight·2025
Same author

Implementation of a Kidney Screening Intervention to Improve Early CKD Detection in Adults with Diabetes.

Kidney360·2025
Same author

CUBE: A Collaborative Undergraduate Biostatistics Experience To Bring Diversity And Awareness To The Field Of Collaborative Biostatistics.

Journal of STEM education : innovations and research·2025
Same journal

Estimating an intervention's effects on health care disparities within and between physician organizations: decomposing the effects of health system affiliation.

Health services & outcomes research methodology·2026
Same journal

Gaming the System: Evaluating Spillover in a Video Game Intervention for Advance Care Planning using Physician Social Networks.

Health services & outcomes research methodology·2026
Same journal

A causal framework for evaluating drivers of policy effect heterogeneity using difference-in-differences.

Health services & outcomes research methodology·2026
Same journal

Choosing an analytic approach: key study design considerations in state policy evaluation.

Health services & outcomes research methodology·2026
Same journal

The challenges of integrating diverse data sources: A case study in major depression.

Health services & outcomes research methodology·2026
Same journal

The impact of knowledge of hospitalization on mortality predictions.

Health services & outcomes research methodology·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 21, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

Methods for Estimating and Interpreting Provider-Specific Standardized Mortality Ratios.

Jiannong Liu1, Thomas A Louis, Wei Pan

  • 1United States Renal Data System, Minneapolis Medical Research Foundation, Minneapolis, MN, USA jliu@nephrology.org.

Health Services & Outcomes Research Methodology
|July 17, 2009
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Standardized Mortality Ratios (SMRs) are crucial for assessing healthcare quality. This study introduces a hierarchical model to accurately compare SMRs, accounting for statistical uncertainty and provider size to avoid biased performance evaluations.

More Related Videos

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
04:57

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 21, 2026

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index
06:55

Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting (Propensity Score) using the Military Health System Data Repository and National Death Index

Published on: January 8, 2020

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data
04:57

Establishing a Competing Risk Regression Nomogram Model for Survival Data

Published on: October 23, 2020

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Health Services Research
  • Quality Improvement

Background:

  • Standardized Mortality Ratios (SMRs) are vital for evaluating healthcare provider quality.
  • Inaccurate SMR estimation or interpretation can lead to significant consequences.
  • Current methods for comparing SMRs are flawed, penalizing providers based on size or statistical uncertainty.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and present a robust statistical approach for comparing SMRs.
  • To accurately estimate and rank provider-specific SMRs.
  • To calculate the probability of a provider's true SMR percentile.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized a hierarchical statistical model.
  • Developed a suite of comparison methods addressing SMRs' statistical uncertainty.
  • Applied the approach to the 1998 United States Renal Data System (USRDS) dialysis provider data.

Main Results:

  • The hierarchical model provides a more equitable comparison of SMRs across providers.
  • The method accounts for varying statistical uncertainty and provider size.
  • Accurate provider-specific SMR percentiles and probability ranges were calculated.

Conclusions:

  • The proposed hierarchical modeling approach offers a superior method for comparing SMRs.
  • This approach mitigates biases inherent in traditional SMR comparison methods.
  • Accurate SMR comparison is essential for effective healthcare quality assessment and improvement.