Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 21, 2026

08:21
Utilizing a 3D Printed Laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplication Model to Shorten a Resident's Learning Curve
Published on: August 15, 2025
Preliminary study of virtual reality and model simulation for learning laparoscopic suturing skills
Elspeth M McDougall1, Surendra B Kolla, Rosanne T Santos
1Department of Urology, University of California, Irvine, Orange, California, USA. elspethm@uci.edu
The Journal of Urology
|July 21, 2009
Summary
Medical students training in laparoscopic suturing and knot tying showed no significant difference in porcine cystorrhaphy skills between pelvic trainers and virtual reality simulators. Pelvic trainers may offer a more user-friendly introduction to these complex laparoscopic skills for novice surgeons.
Area of Science:
- Surgical Education
- Minimally Invasive Surgery
- Medical Simulation
Background:
- Laparoscopic suturing and knot tying proficiency is crucial for reconstructive surgery.
- Developing effective training methods for novice surgeons is essential.
- Comparing traditional and simulation-based training modalities is important for surgical education.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the effectiveness of a pelvic trainer versus a virtual reality simulator for learning laparoscopic suturing and knot tying.
- To evaluate the subsequent performance of porcine laparoscopic cystorrhaphy by medical students trained with these methods.
- To assess the user-friendliness of each training modality for novice surgeons.
Main Methods:
- 20 laparoscopically naive medical students received didactic and video training.
- Students were randomized to 2 hours of training on either a pelvic trainer (10) or a virtual reality simulator (10).
- Performance was assessed via porcine laparoscopic cystorrhaphy, evaluated by blinded expert surgeons using objective structured assessment of technical skills.
Main Results:
- No significant difference in cystorrhaphy time or technical skill scores between the pelvic trainer and virtual reality groups.
- Higher incidence of bladder leaks in the virtual reality group (60%) compared to the pelvic trainer group (30%).
- More virtual reality trainees found the session too short (p=0.04).
Conclusions:
- Both pelvic trainers and virtual reality simulators provide comparable proficiency in porcine laparoscopic cystorrhaphy for novice surgeons.
- Further training is required for clinical proficiency in both groups.
- Pelvic trainers may be more user-friendly for initial learning of laparoscopic skills.
