Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 21, 2026
Application of Hemostatic Devices in Laparoscopic Hepatectomy
Published on: April 19, 2022
How well does CT predict the need for laparotomy in hemodynamically stable patients with penetrating abdominal
Cyle S Goodman1, Jee Y Hur, Marc A Adajar
1Chicago Medical School, 3333 Green Bay Rd., North Chicago, IL 60064, USA. cyle.goodman@my.rfums.org
Insights
Computed tomography (CT) effectively predicts the need for laparotomy in patients with penetrating abdominal injuries. While CT demonstrates high accuracy and sensitivity, its positive predictive value (PPV) requires further improvement.
Area of Science:
- Medical Imaging
- Trauma Surgery
- Diagnostic Accuracy
Background:
- Penetrating abdominal injuries require prompt and accurate diagnosis to determine the need for surgical intervention (laparotomy).
- Computed tomography (CT) is a widely used imaging modality in trauma assessment.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the predictive performance of CT scans in identifying the necessity of laparotomy for hemodynamically stable patients with penetrating abdominal trauma.
Main Methods:
- A systematic review and meta-analysis of MEDLINE-indexed articles published between January 1994 and June 2008.
- Calculation of sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), positive predictive value (PPV), and accuracy for CT in predicting laparotomy.
Main Results:
- The meta-analysis included five studies comprising 180 relevant articles.
- Pooled estimates indicated high performance: sensitivity (94.90%), specificity (95.38%), NPV (98.62%), PPV (84.51%), and accuracy (94.70%).
Conclusions:
- CT demonstrates high sensitivity, specificity, NPV, and accuracy for predicting laparotomy in penetrating abdominal trauma.
- Despite its overall effectiveness, CT's positive predictive value (PPV) for determining the need for laparotomy has room for enhancement.
Objective:
The objective of our study was to determine how well CT predicts the need for laparotomy in hemodynamically stable patients with penetrating abdominal injury.
Materials And Methods:
We reviewed MEDLINE articles published from January 1994 through June 2008. The sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), positive predictive value (PPV), and accuracy were calculated for each source and collectively using a meta-analysis.
Results:
Of 180 relevant studies, five were included in the meta-analysis. Pooled weighted estimates of sensitivity, specificity, NPV, PPV, and accuracy were 94.90%, 95.38%, 98.62%, 84.51%, and 94.70%, respectively.
Conclusion:
CT in patients with penetrating abdominal trauma has high sensitivity, specificity, NPV, and accuracy, but has lower PPV in determining the need for laparotomy. It follows that CT is an indispensable tool in predicting the need for laparotomy in these patients but still has room for improvement.
