Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 21, 2026
13:09
Using Brain Activation (nir-HEG/Q-EEG) and Execution Measures (CPTs) in a ADHD Assessment Protocol
Published on: April 1, 2018
Interdisciplinary assessment strategies for capturing the elusive executive
Larry E Schutz1, Richard L Wanlass
1Traumatic Brain Injury Program (LES), Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida 32826, USA.
American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation
|July 22, 2009
Summary
Executive functions are engaged when tasks are perceived as difficult or critical. To accurately measure executive function, diverse assessment methods are essential due to individual differences in motivation and attitudes.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Psychology
- Neuroscience
- Psychometrics
Background:
- Executive functions are cognitive processes crucial for goal-directed behavior.
- Current assessment methods may not capture the full spectrum of executive functioning.
- Individual differences in motivation and perception influence task engagement.
Purpose of the Study:
- To explore the theoretical underpinnings of executive function activation.
- To advocate for diversified assessment strategies for executive functions.
- To highlight the role of subjective task perception in executive assessment.
Main Methods:
- Theoretical analysis of executive function activation models.
- Review of existing executive function assessment methodologies.
- Conceptual framework for diversified executive assessment.
Main Results:
- Executive functions are selectively activated based on perceived task difficulty and importance.
- Standardized tests may yield variable results due to individual differences in motivation and attitudes.
- A single test cannot comprehensively measure executive function across all individuals.
Conclusions:
- Executive function assessment requires tests perceived as challenging and important by the subject.
- Diverse measurement procedures are necessary to accurately assess the range of executive functioning.
- Transdisciplinary teams are well-positioned to conduct comprehensive, diversified executive assessments.
Related Concept Videos
01:25Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding
Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
01:29Impression Management Techniques III: Aligning Actions
Aligning actions are communicative strategies individuals employ to maintain social harmony and preserve personal identity in the face of potential disruptions to social norms. These actions are particularly important in managing social impressions when one's behavior might be seen as inappropriate, incompetent, or morally questionable.Types of Aligning ActionsThe three principal types of aligning actions are disclaimers, accounts, and apologies.DisclaimersDisclaimers are preventive; they are...
01:29Introspection
Introspection, long upheld as a reliable route to self-knowledge, involves examining one's thoughts, emotions, and mental processes. It underpins many psychological practices, from mindfulness meditation to psychotherapy and self-help strategies. However, empirical evidence challenges the accuracy of introspection as a means of understanding oneself.Limitations of Introspective InsightSeminal work by Nisbett and Wilson demonstrated that individuals are frequently unaware of the true causes...