Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 21, 2026

Two-Step Tag-Free Isolation of Mitochondria for Improved Protein Discovery and Quantification
Published on: June 2, 2023
Comparative analyses of cell disruption methods for mitochondrial isolation in high-throughput proteomics study
Sakdithep Chaiyarit1, Visith Thongboonkerd
1Medical Proteomics Unit, Office for Research and Development, Department of Immunology and Immunology Graduate Program, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Abstract:
One of the most crucial steps in mitochondrial isolation is disruption of intact cells to denude intracellular organelles, but the yield and purity of different disruption protocols have not been well addressed. In the present study, MDCK cells were disrupted by mechanical (sonication and homogenization), physical (repeated freeze/thaw cycles and hypoosmotic burst), and chemical (using Triton X-100, NP-40, or CHAPS) methods. Efficacy of cell disruption was evaluated by trypan blue staining and mitochondria were subsequently isolated by standardized differential centrifugation. The yield of isolation was also determined by measuring protein concentrations, whereas the purity was examined by Janus green B staining, Western blot analyses of markers for mitochondria (COX-4) and other subcellular organelles/locales (i.e., nucleus, cytoplasm, endoplasmic reticulum, and lysosome), transmission electron microscopy, two-dimensional electrophoresis, and Q-TOF MS and/or MS/MS analyses. Our data demonstrated that sonication is the method of choice for disruption of cells prior to mitochondrial isolation for proteome analysis.
Insights
Sonication is the best method for disrupting cells before isolating mitochondria for proteome analysis. This mechanical method provides superior yield and purity compared to physical or chemical cell disruption techniques.
Area of Science:
- Biochemistry
- Cell Biology
- Proteomics
Background:
- Mitochondrial isolation requires effective cell disruption.
- Yield and purity of isolated mitochondria vary with disruption methods.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate and compare different cell disruption methods for mitochondrial isolation.
- To determine the optimal method for high-yield and high-purity mitochondrial isolation for proteome analysis.
Main Methods:
- MDCK cells disrupted using mechanical (sonication, homogenization), physical (freeze/thaw, hypoosmotic), and chemical (detergents) methods.
- Cell disruption efficacy assessed by trypan blue staining.
- Mitochondria isolated via differential centrifugation.
- Yield determined by protein concentration; purity assessed by staining, Western blot, TEM, 2D electrophoresis, and mass spectrometry.
Main Results:
- Sonication demonstrated superior efficacy in cell disruption.
- Mitochondrial isolation following sonication yielded higher purity and yield.
- Proteomic analysis is best supported by mitochondria isolated using the sonication method.
Conclusions:
- Sonication is the recommended method for cell disruption prior to mitochondrial isolation for proteome studies.
- Optimized cell disruption is critical for accurate mitochondrial proteome analysis.
- This study provides a comparative analysis of cell disruption techniques for mitochondrial isolation.
Related Concept Videos
Tissue Homogenization and Cell Lysis
Mechanical methods of tissue homogenization
These methods rely on applying external physical force to disrupt...
Subcellular Fractionation
Differential Centrifugation
Differential centrifugation is...

