Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Optimal Foraging00:48

Optimal Foraging

How animals obtain and eat their food is called foraging behavior. Foraging can include searching for plants and hunting for prey and depends on the species and environment.
Pollination and Flower Structure02:40

Pollination and Flower Structure

Flowers are the reproductive, seed-producing structures of angiosperms. Typically, flowers consist of sepals, petals, stamens, and carpels. Sepals and petals are the vegetative flower organs. Stamens and carpels are the reproductive organs.
Predator-Prey Interactions02:39

Predator-Prey Interactions

Predators consume prey for energy. Predators that acquire prey and prey that avoid predation both increase their chances of survival and reproduction (i.e., fitness). Routine predator-prey interactions elicit mutual adaptations that improve predator offenses, such as claws, teeth, and speed, as well as prey defenses, including crypsis, aposematism, and mimicry. Thus, predator-prey interactions resemble an evolutionary arms race.Although predation is commonly associated with carnivory, for...
Altruism01:03

Altruism

Altruistic behaviors are “unselfish” behaviors—those that help another individual at the expense of the individual carrying out the behavior. Despite the negative consequences for the altruistic animal, these behaviors are thought to have evolved for several reasons.
Frequency-dependent Selection01:21

Frequency-dependent Selection

When the fitness of a trait is influenced by how common it is (i.e., its frequency) relative to different traits within a population, this is referred to as frequency-dependent selection. Frequency-dependent selection may occur between species or within a single species. This type of selection can either be positive—with more common phenotypes having higher fitness—or negative, with rarer phenotypes conferring increased fitness.Positive Frequency-Dependent SelectionIn positive...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A century of weekly notifiable disease incidence data by province in Canada.

PLOS global public health·2025
Same author

Uncovering the genetic basis of competitiveness and the potential for cooperation in plant groups.

Proceedings. Biological sciences·2025
Same author

Spatial partitioning of floral volatiles provides a "chemosensory roadmap" for bumblebee pollinators.

Current biology : CB·2025
Same author

Exploring the dynamics of the 2022 mpox outbreak in Canada.

Journal of medical virology·2023
Same author

Kin selection theory and the design of cooperative crops.

Evolutionary applications·2022
Same author

Distinct neuropeptide-receptor modules regulate a sex-specific behavioral response to a pheromone.

Communications biology·2021

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 21, 2026

Radio Frequency Identification and Motion-sensitive Video Efficiently Automate Recording of Unrewarded Choice Behavior by Bumblebees
09:09

Radio Frequency Identification and Motion-sensitive Video Efficiently Automate Recording of Unrewarded Choice Behavior by Bumblebees

Published on: November 15, 2014

Bumblebees learn to forage like Bayesians.

Jay M Biernaskie1, Steven C Walker, Robert J Gegear

  • 1Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 3B2, Canada. jay.biernaskie@utoronto.ca

The American Naturalist
|July 28, 2009
PubMed
Summary

Bumblebee foragers rapidly learn resource distribution, adapting their patch-staying behavior based on environmental experience. This learned prior information significantly enhances their foraging efficiency in patchy environments.

More Related Videos

Tactile Conditioning And Movement Analysis Of Antennal Sampling Strategies In Honey Bees (Apis mellifera L.)
10:14

Tactile Conditioning And Movement Analysis Of Antennal Sampling Strategies In Honey Bees (Apis mellifera L.)

Published on: December 12, 2012

A 3D Printed Pollen Trap for Bumble Bee (Bombus) Hive Entrances
07:19

A 3D Printed Pollen Trap for Bumble Bee (Bombus) Hive Entrances

Published on: July 9, 2020

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 21, 2026

Radio Frequency Identification and Motion-sensitive Video Efficiently Automate Recording of Unrewarded Choice Behavior by Bumblebees
09:09

Radio Frequency Identification and Motion-sensitive Video Efficiently Automate Recording of Unrewarded Choice Behavior by Bumblebees

Published on: November 15, 2014

Tactile Conditioning And Movement Analysis Of Antennal Sampling Strategies In Honey Bees (Apis mellifera L.)
10:14

Tactile Conditioning And Movement Analysis Of Antennal Sampling Strategies In Honey Bees (Apis mellifera L.)

Published on: December 12, 2012

A 3D Printed Pollen Trap for Bumble Bee (Bombus) Hive Entrances
07:19

A 3D Printed Pollen Trap for Bumble Bee (Bombus) Hive Entrances

Published on: July 9, 2020

Area of Science:

  • Behavioral Ecology
  • Animal Cognition

Background:

  • Bayesian foraging models predict animals use prior information about resource distribution.
  • This prior information can be innate or learned, influencing patch-selection strategies.
  • Understanding learned priors is crucial for explaining foraging plasticity.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if bumblebee foragers can rapidly learn prior information about resource distribution.
  • To determine if learned foraging strategies adapt to different environmental variances (high vs. uniform).
  • To confirm the role of learned prior expectations in optimizing foraging behavior.

Main Methods:

  • Experimental manipulation of patch quality in high-variance and uniform environments.
  • Observation of bumblebee foraging behavior and reward intake rates.
  • Application of Cox regression models to analyze patch-staying tendencies.
  • Testing for carry-over effects of learned behavior in a common environment.

Main Results:

  • Bumblebees demonstrated rapid learning of prior information within hours.
  • Bees adjusted their patch-staying behavior (incremental vs. decremental responses) according to environmental predictions.
  • Learned foraging strategies improved reward intake rates to an average of 80% of the predicted maximum.
  • Adaptive behaviors persisted after training, indicating memorized prior information.

Conclusions:

  • Bumblebee foragers exhibit remarkable adaptive plasticity through learned prior expectations.
  • This study provides the first clear evidence of isolating the adaptive use of learned priors in Bayesian foraging.
  • Learned prior information significantly enhances foraging efficiency in complex, patchy environments.