Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 21, 2026
06:19
Non-Nutritive Suck Parameters Measurements Using a Custom Pressure Transducer System
Published on: April 19, 2024
To Nuss or not to Nuss? Two opposing views
Francis Robicsek1, André Hebra
1Department of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, North Carolina 28203, USA. FRobicsek@carolinashealthcare.org
Seminars in Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
|July 28, 2009
Summary
The Nuss operation, a novel pectus excavatum repair, challenges traditional surgical standards. This article presents contrasting viewpoints on this innovative pectus surgery technique.
Area of Science:
- Thoracic surgery
- Pediatric surgery
- Surgical innovation
Background:
- Pectus excavatum repair approaches have historically been debated.
- The Nuss operation represents a significant advancement in pectus surgery.
- Established pectus excavatum surgical standards are being re-evaluated.
Purpose of the Study:
- To present and contrast two expert opinions on pectus excavatum repair.
- To discuss the impact of the Nuss operation on pectus surgery.
- To explore differing perspectives on pectus excavatum surgical techniques.
Main Methods:
- Presentation of expert viewpoints.
- Comparative analysis of surgical approaches.
- Discussion of established vs. novel pectus excavatum repair methods.
Main Results:
- The Nuss operation presents a challenge to conventional pectus excavatum surgery.
- Divergent opinions exist regarding the optimal pectus excavatum repair method.
- The debate highlights evolving concepts in pectus surgery.
Conclusions:
- The Nuss operation is a significant development in pectus excavatum repair.
- Contrasting views underscore the ongoing evolution of pectus surgery.
- Further discussion is needed to establish consensus on pectus excavatum treatment.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
01:14Norton's Theorem
Norton's theorem is a fundamental principle stating that a linear two-terminal circuit can be substituted with an equivalent circuit, which comprises a current source (ⅠN) in parallel with a resistor (RN). Here, ⅠN represents the short-circuit current flowing through the terminals, and RN stands for the input or equivalent resistance at the terminals when all independent sources are deactivated. This implies that the circuit illustrated in Figure (a) can be exchanged with the one depicted in...
01:16Null and Alternative Hypotheses
The actual hypothesis testing begins by considering two hypotheses. They are termed the null hypothesis and the alternative hypothesis. These hypotheses contain opposing viewpoints.
The null hypothesis, denoted by H0 is a statement of no difference between the variables—they are not related. This can often be considered the status quo. As a result if you cannot accept the null, it requires some action.
The alternative hypothesis, denoted by H1 or Ha, is a claim about the population that is...
The null hypothesis, denoted by H0 is a statement of no difference between the variables—they are not related. This can often be considered the status quo. As a result if you cannot accept the null, it requires some action.
The alternative hypothesis, denoted by H1 or Ha, is a claim about the population that is...
01:44Nociception
Nociception—the ability to feel pain—is essential for an organism’s survival and overall well-being. Noxious stimuli such as piercing pain from a sharp object, heat from an open flame, or contact with corrosive chemicals are first detected by sensory receptors, called nociceptors, located on nerve endings. Nociceptors express ion channels that convert noxious stimuli into electrical signals. When these signals reach the brain via sensory neurons, they are perceived as pain. Thus, pain helps the...
01:14Frustration and Conflict: Avoidance-Avoidance, Double-Approach Avoidance
Avoidance-avoidance conflict refers to a psychological situation where a person must choose between two or more unpleasant alternatives. These conflicts are particularly stressful because neither option is desirable. This dilemma is often expressed in sayings like "caught between a rock and a hard place" or "between the devil and the deep blue sea." For instance, individuals who fear dental procedures may find themselves torn between enduring a painful toothache or facing the anxiety of...
01:20Frustration and Conflict: Approach-Approach, Approach-Avoidance
Frustration occurs when people are obstructed or prevented from achieving a desired goal or fulfilling a perceived need. For example, when someone's input is ignored in a discussion, it can lead to feelings of frustration. Conflict, however, arises from opposing interests, goals, or actions. Conflicts can take various forms based on the nature of these opposing desires or goals.
One common type of conflict is the Approach–Approach Conflict. In this case, a person faces two desirable options,...
One common type of conflict is the Approach–Approach Conflict. In this case, a person faces two desirable options,...
01:17Hypothesis: Accept or Fail to Reject?
The outcome of any hypothesis testing leads to rejecting or not rejecting the null hypothesis. This decision is taken based on the analysis of the data, an appropriate test statistic, an appropriate confidence level, the critical values, and P-values. However, when the evidence suggests that the null hypothesis cannot be rejected, is it right to say, 'Accept' the null hypothesis?
There are two ways to indicate that the null hypothesis is not rejected. 'Accept' the null hypothesis and 'fail to...
There are two ways to indicate that the null hypothesis is not rejected. 'Accept' the null hypothesis and 'fail to...