Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

One-Compartment Open Model: Wagner-Nelson and Loo Riegelman Method for ka Estimation01:24

One-Compartment Open Model: Wagner-Nelson and Loo Riegelman Method for ka Estimation

This lesson introduces two critical methods in pharmacokinetics, the Wagner-Nelson and Loo-Riegelman methods, used for estimating the absorption rate constant (ka) for drugs administered via non-intravenous routes. The Wagner-Nelson method relates ka to the plasma concentration derived from the slope of a semilog percent unabsorbed time plot. However, it is limited to drugs with one-compartment kinetics and can be impacted by factors like gastrointestinal motility or enzymatic degradation.
On...
Common Leveling Mistakes and Errors01:17

Common Leveling Mistakes and Errors

A survey team is tasked with determining the elevation difference between points Point A and Point B, separated by uneven terrain. They use a leveling instrument and a leveling rod.Common MistakesMisreading the Rod: During a backsight reading at Point A, the instrumentman observes the rod partially obscured by tall grass. Instead of reading 1.135 m, they mistakenly record 1.735 m due to the misalignment of the crosshair with the wrong graduation. This error adds 0.600 m to all subsequent...
Difference from Background: Limit of Detection01:05

Difference from Background: Limit of Detection

The limit of detection (LOD) is the smallest amount of analyte that can be distinguished from the background noise. The LOD value corresponds to the concentration at which the analyte signal is three times larger than the standard deviation of the blank signal. Below this value, the analyte signal cannot be differentiated from the background noise. It is calculated by dividing the calibration slope by 3 times the standard deviation of the blank signals.
The LOD indicates the presence or absence...
Estimation of the Physical Quantities01:05

Estimation of the Physical Quantities

On many occasions, physicists, other scientists, and engineers need to make estimates of a particular quantity. These are sometimes referred to as guesstimates, order-of-magnitude approximations, back-of-the-envelope calculations, or Fermi calculations. The physicist Enrico Fermi was famous for his ability to estimate various kinds of data with surprising precision. Estimating does not mean guessing a number or a formula at random. Instead, estimation means using prior experience and sound...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A sequential model of two-choice intensity identification.

Frontiers in cognition·2026
Same author

What is prepared in temporal preparation? A review and a historical appreciation.

Frontiers in psychology·2026
Same author

[Doping in recreational sports].

Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz·2026
Same author

Ten years Diffusion Model for Conflict (DMC) tasks: Theoretical foundations, applications, practical recommendations, and open challenges.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same author

The time-intensity uncertainty principle in vision.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
Same author

Internal reference updating in visual duration discrimination: A search for boundary conditions : Internal reference updating.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 21, 2026

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

Estimating the difference limen in 2AFC tasks: pitfalls and improved estimators.

Rolf Ulrich1, Dirk Vorberg

  • 1Department of Cognitive and Biological Psychology, Psychological Institute, University of Tübingen, Friedrichstr. 21, 72072 Tübingen, Germany. ulrich@uni-tuebingen.de

Attention, Perception & Psychophysics
|July 28, 2009
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Estimating the difference limen (DL) using two-alternative forced choice (2AFC) tasks can be inaccurate due to order effects. This study reveals potential biases in DL estimation and proposes a new method for analyzing 2AFC data to improve accuracy.

More Related Videos

A Gaze-Contingent Display Framework for Perceptual Learning Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss
07:12

A Gaze-Contingent Display Framework for Perceptual Learning Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Published on: April 11, 2025

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 21, 2026

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons
07:13

A Two-interval Forced-choice Task for Multisensory Comparisons

Published on: November 9, 2018

A Gaze-Contingent Display Framework for Perceptual Learning Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss
07:12

A Gaze-Contingent Display Framework for Perceptual Learning Research with Simulated Central Vision Loss

Published on: April 11, 2025

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments
13:00

Measuring Attention and Visual Processing Speed by Model-based Analysis of Temporal-order Judgments

Published on: January 23, 2017

Area of Science:

  • Psychology
  • Perception Science
  • Psychophysics

Background:

  • Discrimination performance is commonly measured using the difference limen (DL), or just noticeable difference.
  • The two-alternative forced choice (2AFC) task is a standard method for estimating DL.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of order effects on DL estimation in 2AFC tasks.
  • To identify potential systematic biases in current DL estimation methods.
  • To propose a novel approach for analyzing 2AFC data to improve accuracy.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of percentage-correct data from 2AFC tasks.
  • Investigating the influence of order effects on DL calculations.
  • Development of a new data analysis methodology for 2AFC tasks.

Main Results:

  • The DL estimated from 2AFC percentage-correct data can be systematically biased (under- or overestimated) when order effects are present.
  • Identified specific conditions under which 2AFC tasks lead to inaccurate DL estimates.
  • A novel analytical approach was developed to mitigate these biases.

Conclusions:

  • Standard 2AFC tasks may yield unreliable DL estimates due to unaddressed order effects.
  • Awareness of order effects is crucial for accurate assessment of discrimination performance.
  • The proposed novel analysis method offers a more robust approach to DL estimation from 2AFC data.