Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Visual Agnosia01:12

Visual Agnosia

Visual agnosia is a condition characterized by the inability to recognize visually presented objects despite having normal vision. For instance, a person with visual agnosia can describe the shape and color of an object but cannot identify or name it. This impairment does not affect their visual field, acuity, color vision, brightness discrimination, language, or memory. An example of this condition in a social setting is someone at a dinner party asking for "that silver thing with a round end"...
Color Vision01:24

Color Vision

Color perception begins in the retina, the light-sensitive layer at the back of the eye. Two main theories explain how colors are seen: the trichromatic theory and the opponent-process theory. The trichromatic theory, proposed by Thomas Young in 1802 and extended by Hermann von Helmholtz in 1852, suggests that color vision is based on three types of cone receptors in the retina. These cones are sensitive to different but overlapping ranges of wavelengths corresponding to red, blue, and green.

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Lymphocyte Micronucleus Formation Is Driven by Inflammation-Induced Oxidative DNA Damage in Oesophageal Cancer Development.

International journal of cancer·2026
Same author

Working memory load attenuates the match effect in sentence-picture verification.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same author

Familial medullary thyroid carcinoma secondary to an <i>SLC30A9</i> intragenic deletion and translation reinitiation.

medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences·2026
Same author

Evaluating the contributions of top-down and bottom-up processing on eye movements during parallel visual search.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
Same author

Toward a better understanding of target distinctiveness in visual search: How color, shape, and texture information combine to guide search.

Journal of experimental psychology. General·2026
Same author

Combating the Plague of Health Misinformation in Memes: Exploring the Influence of Transmission and Ritual Vaccine Messaging Using the Six-Segment Message Strategy Wheel.

Journal of health communication·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 21, 2026

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking
05:58

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking

Published on: August 29, 2018

Inhibitory tagging in an interrupted visual search.

Laura E Thomas1, Alejandro Lleras

  • 1Psychology Department, Vanderbilt University, 301 Wilson Hall, 111 21st Avenue South, Nashville, TN 37203, USA. laura.e.thomas@vanderbilt.edu

Attention, Perception & Psychophysics
|July 28, 2009
PubMed
Summary

Inhibition of return biases attention away from searched locations. This study shows inhibitory tagging occurs even without visual search displays and depends on attentional set and search progress.

More Related Videos

Simultaneous Eye Tracking and Single-Neuron Recordings in Human Epilepsy Patients
07:43

Simultaneous Eye Tracking and Single-Neuron Recordings in Human Epilepsy Patients

Published on: June 17, 2019

Investigation of Synaptic Tagging/Capture and Cross-capture using Acute Hippocampal Slices from Rodents
11:29

Investigation of Synaptic Tagging/Capture and Cross-capture using Acute Hippocampal Slices from Rodents

Published on: September 4, 2015

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 21, 2026

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking
05:58

Using Rapid Serial Visual Presentation to Measure Set-Specific Capture, a Consequence of Distraction While Multitasking

Published on: August 29, 2018

Simultaneous Eye Tracking and Single-Neuron Recordings in Human Epilepsy Patients
07:43

Simultaneous Eye Tracking and Single-Neuron Recordings in Human Epilepsy Patients

Published on: June 17, 2019

Investigation of Synaptic Tagging/Capture and Cross-capture using Acute Hippocampal Slices from Rodents
11:29

Investigation of Synaptic Tagging/Capture and Cross-capture using Acute Hippocampal Slices from Rodents

Published on: September 4, 2015

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience
  • Visual Perception

Background:

  • Inhibition of return (IOR) is a mechanism that biases attention away from previously searched locations.
  • Previous research indicated IOR requires search stimuli to remain visible during probe detection.
  • The role of attentional set and the temporal dynamics of IOR were not fully understood.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if inhibitory tagging occurs in the absence of visual search stimuli.
  • To determine if inhibitory tags are linked to actively searched items versus passive distractors.
  • To examine the temporal progression of inhibitory tagging during ongoing visual search.

Main Methods:

  • An interrupted visual search task with alternating search and blank displays was employed.
  • Probe detection accuracy and reaction times were measured at previously searched and unsearched locations.
  • Attentional set was manipulated, and probes were presented at different stages of the search process.

Main Results:

  • Inhibitory tagging was observed even when search displays were absent during probe presentation.
  • Inhibitory tags were specifically associated with items relevant to the participant's attentional set.
  • Early in search, distractor locations showed facilitation, with inhibition emerging later as search progressed.

Conclusions:

  • Inhibitory tagging during visual search is context-dependent and can occur without continuous visual stimuli.
  • Attentional set critically influences the formation of inhibitory tags.
  • Location prioritization in visual search unfolds dynamically over time, with inhibition developing progressively.