Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jun 21, 2026

A Standardized Protocol for Preference Testing to Assess Fish Welfare
Published on: February 22, 2020
How to quantify support for and against the null hypothesis: a flexible WinBUGS implementation of a default Bayesian
Ruud Wetzels1, Jeroen G W Raaijmakers, Emöke Jakab
1University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. wetzels.ruud@gmail.com
Researchers can now quantify evidence for the null hypothesis using the new Savage-Dickey (SD) t test. This Bayesian approach extends previous methods, offering broader applications in statistical hypothesis testing.
Area of Science:
- Statistics
- Bayesian inference
- Hypothesis testing
Background:
- Traditional t tests primarily focus on rejecting the null hypothesis.
- Quantifying evidence in favor of the null hypothesis is statistically challenging.
- Existing Bayesian t tests, like the Jeffreys-Zellner-Siow (JZS) test, have limitations in applicability.
Purpose of the Study:
- To introduce a novel sampling-based Bayesian t test, the Savage-Dickey (SD) t test.
- To enable researchers to quantify statistical evidence supporting the null hypothesis.
- To extend the capabilities of Bayesian hypothesis testing to a wider range of problems.
Main Methods:
- Development of a sampling-based Bayesian t test.
- Adaptation of concepts from the Jeffreys-Zellner-Siow (JZS) t test.
- Implementation for testing order restrictions and unequal variance two-sample situations.
Main Results:
- The Savage-Dickey (SD) t test provides a method to quantify evidence for the null hypothesis.
- The SD test is applicable to a broader set of statistical scenarios than prior methods.
- The test successfully handles order restrictions and two-sample comparisons with heterogeneous variances.
Conclusions:
- The Savage-Dickey (SD) t test offers a valuable tool for Bayesian hypothesis testing.
- Researchers can now more effectively evaluate evidence for the null hypothesis.
- The SD test enhances statistical analysis capabilities in various research fields.
More Related Videos
10:50Using the FishSim Animation Toolchain to Investigate Fish Behavior: A Case Study on Mate-Choice Copying In Sailfin Mollies
Published on: November 8, 2018
08:36The Adjuvant Efficacy of Angong Niuhuang Pill in the Treatment of Viral Encephalitis: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Published on: April 19, 2024
Related Concept Videos
Types of Hypothesis Testing
When the null and alternative hypotheses are stated, it is observed that the null hypothesis is a neutral statement against which the alternative hypothesis is tested. The alternative hypothesis is a claim that instead has a certain direction. If the null hypothesis claims that p = 0.5, the alternative hypothesis would be an opposing statement to this and can be put either p > 0.5, p < 0.5, or p ≠ 0.5.
Decision Making: Traditional Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
Null and Alternative Hypotheses
The null hypothesis, denoted by H0 is a statement of no difference between the variables—they are not related. This can often be considered the status quo. As a result if you cannot accept the null, it requires some action.
The alternative hypothesis, denoted by H1 or Ha, is a claim about the population that is...
Statistical Hypothesis Testing
Statistical significance measures the probability that an observed result occurred by chance. If this probability, known as...
Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test
Bonferroni Test
The means of different samples are first paired in all possible combinations.
The null hypothesis of the...