Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons02:54

Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons

Genome comparison is one of the excellent ways to interpret the evolutionary relationships between organisms. The basic principle of genome comparison is that if two species share a common feature, it is likely encoded by the DNA sequence conserved between both species. The advent of genome sequencing technologies in the late 20th century enabled scientists to understand the concept of conservation of domains between species and helped them to deduce evolutionary relationships across diverse...
Gene Duplication and Divergence02:37

Gene Duplication and Divergence

The seminal work of Ohno in 1970 popularized the idea of gene duplication and divergence. DNA sequence comparison studies reveal that a large portion of the genes in bacteria, archaebacteria, and eukaryotes was  generated by gene duplication and divergence, indicating its critical role in evolution.
The duplicated copies of the gene are called Paralogs. Paralogs with similar sequences and functions form a gene family. Across several species, a large number of gene families are characterized.
Next-generation Sequencing03:00

Next-generation Sequencing

The first human genome sequencing project cost $2.7 billion and was declared complete in 2003, after 15 years of international cooperation and collaboration between several research teams and funding agencies. Today, with the advent of next-generation sequencing technologies, the cost and time of sequencing a human genome have dropped over 100 fold.
Next-Generation Sequencing Methods
Although all next-generation methods use different technologies, they all share a set of standard features.
Maxam-Gilbert Sequencing01:05

Maxam-Gilbert Sequencing

In the same year as the discovery of the Sanger sequencing method, another group of scientists, Allan Maxam and Walter Gilbert, demonstrated their chemical-cleavage method for DNA sequencing. The Maxam-Gilbert method relies on using different chemicals that can cleave the DNA sequence at specific sites, the separation of resulting DNA fragments of variable size using electrophoresis, and deciphering the DNA sequence from the resulting gel bands.
Challenges of the Maxam-Gilbert Method
The...
Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?02:05

Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?

The genomes of eukaryotes are punctuated by long stretches of sequence which do not code for proteins or RNAs. Although some of these regions do contain crucial regulatory sequences, the vast majority of this DNA serves no known function. Typically, these regions of the genome are the ones in which the fastest change, in evolutionary terms, is observed, because there is typically little to no selection pressure acting on these regions to preserve their sequences.
In contrast, regions which code...
Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?02:05

Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?

The genomes of eukaryotes are punctuated by long stretches of sequence which do not code for proteins or RNAs. Although some of these regions do contain crucial regulatory sequences, the vast majority of this DNA serves no known function. Typically, these regions of the genome are the ones in which the fastest change, in evolutionary terms, is observed, because there is typically little to no selection pressure acting on these regions to preserve their sequences.
In contrast, regions which code...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Cytoplasmic Shift of Interferon Regulatory Factors Co-Evolved With Jawed Vertebrate Innate Immunity.

Journal of medical virology·2025
Same author

The primate-specific presence of interferon regulatory factor-5 pseudogene 1.

Journal of medical virology·2024
Same author

Association of IS<i>Vsa3</i> with Multidrug Resistance in <i>Salmonella enterica</i> Isolates from Cattle (<i>Bos taurus</i>).

Microorganisms·2023
Same author

Small RNAs >26 nt in length associate with AGO1 and are upregulated by nutrient deprivation in the alga Chlamydomonas.

The Plant cell·2023
Same author

Evolution and emergence of primate-specific interferon regulatory factor 9.

Journal of medical virology·2023
Same author

Divergent evolution of extreme production of variant plant monounsaturated fatty acids.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2022
Same journal

Phylogenomic blind spots: The limits of UCE and BUSCO loci in the presence of gene flow.

Molecular biology and evolution·2026
Same journal

seqLens: optimizing language models for genomic predictions.

Molecular biology and evolution·2026
Same journal

The transcriptional and translational outcomes for pseudogenes in bacterial endosymbionts.

Molecular biology and evolution·2026
Same journal

800 million years of co-evolution in the green plant lineage - the case of LEUNIG and SEUSS transcriptional co-regulators.

Molecular biology and evolution·2026
Same journal

RNA i-motif landscapes in plant kingdom and their potential functional roles.

Molecular biology and evolution·2026
Same journal

Functional Divergence and Structural Changes of class IV Histone Deacetylases (HDACs) Across the Tree of Life.

Molecular biology and evolution·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jun 21, 2026

Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations
04:52

Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations

Published on: February 3, 2023

Biological sequence simulation for testing complex evolutionary hypotheses: indel-Seq-Gen version 2.0.

Cory L Strope1, Kevin Abel, Stephen D Scott

  • 1Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of Nebraska, NE, USA.

Molecular Biology and Evolution
|August 5, 2009
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Sequence simulation is crucial for testing biological hypotheses. The new indel-Seq-Gen version 2.0 (iSGv2.0) simulates complex DNA and protein evolution, addressing limitations in previous methods.

More Related Videos

A Practical Guide to Phylogenetics for Nonexperts
12:00

A Practical Guide to Phylogenetics for Nonexperts

Published on: February 5, 2014

Novel Sequence Discovery by Subtractive Genomics
09:40

Novel Sequence Discovery by Subtractive Genomics

Published on: January 25, 2019

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jun 21, 2026

Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations
04:52

Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations

Published on: February 3, 2023

A Practical Guide to Phylogenetics for Nonexperts
12:00

A Practical Guide to Phylogenetics for Nonexperts

Published on: February 5, 2014

Novel Sequence Discovery by Subtractive Genomics
09:40

Novel Sequence Discovery by Subtractive Genomics

Published on: January 25, 2019

Area of Science:

  • Bioinformatics
  • Computational Biology
  • Molecular Evolution

Background:

  • Sequence simulation is vital for validating biological hypotheses and testing bioinformatics methods.
  • Current methods struggle with complex hypotheses requiring heterogeneous sequence evolution models.
  • Previous tool indel-Seq-Gen version 1.0 (iSGv1.0) offered improvements but remained insufficient for advanced testing.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To introduce indel-Seq-Gen version 2.0 (iSGv2.0) for simulating the evolution of highly divergent DNA sequences and protein superfamilies.
  • To enhance sequence simulation capabilities for complex evolutionary scenarios.
  • To address and correct flaws in existing indel modeling.

Main Methods:

  • iSGv2.0 incorporates lineage-specific evolution, PROSITE-like regular expression motif conservation, indel tracking, and subsequence-length constraints.
  • It simulates both coding and noncoding DNA evolution.
  • A novel discrete stepping procedure corrects a flaw in indel modeling, preventing simulation result bias.

Main Results:

  • iSGv2.0 demonstrates improved simulation of heterogeneous protein and DNA sequence evolution.
  • The new discrete stepping procedure rectifies biases in indel modeling.
  • Comparative analysis shows iSGv2.0 outperforms iSGv1.0 and random models for complex evolutionary simulations.

Conclusions:

  • iSGv2.0 provides a more robust and accurate tool for simulating complex sequence evolution, particularly for highly divergent sequences and protein superfamilies.
  • The corrected indel modeling enhances the reliability of simulations for hypothesis testing.
  • This advancement facilitates more sophisticated validation of biological hypotheses and evolutionary methods.